And they’re already kissing Trump’s ass

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    So I am assuming most Lemmy people don’t use Tiktok or Meta stuff. Here is some things you may or may not already know.

    • Shou (CEO) made a parting video praising Trump on the last day
    • Shou will be on the stage with all the other tech billionaires during inauguration
    • People have noticed the last couple days that FB and Instagram have had a “link your Tiktok account” so you don’t lose anything on the platform

    I think it’s pretty obvious now that Tiktok is going to become a part of Meta one way or another.

  • WeUnite@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I did some research and now I know why Trump wants to “save” TikTok.

    https://www.theinformation.com/articles/how-tiktok-courted-conservatives-before-trumps-win

    https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-publications/tiktok-and-white-supremacist-content/

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/on-tiktok-misogyny-and-white-supremacy-slip-through-enforcement-gap

    https://www.counterextremism.com/press/extremist-content-online-tiktok-accounts-spreading-extreme-right-propaganda-and-glorifying

    https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/01/16/congress/tiktok-sponsor-trump-inauguration-party-00198825

    This one is especially damning:

    TikTok is spending $50,000 on an inauguration party honoring influencers who helped Donald Trump spread his campaign message, according to the party organizer — and it’s scheduled for Sunday, the deadline for the company to spin off from its China-based owner or be banned in the U.S.

    CEO Shou Zi Chew is expected to attend.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Spreading for awareness, I’ve been posting this in relevant threads for a week - This is all theater.

    trump is going to “save” tik tok after starting the initial push to ban it (for the wrong reasons) to pretend he did something for you. Worst part is that all of the no/low info voters and non voters will eat it up.

    It’s the equivalent of a person pushing you into the middle of the street and at the very last second, that same person tells the drivers to all stop. “Wow, I owe you my life!”

    And now, this adds two layers:

    1. You think trump and the Supreme Court are colluding? now they get to say, nah uh!!! Even though again, this is all convoluted.

    2. trump gets to look “stronger” than the “highest court in the land” to help delude the next generation of low info tiktok folks.

    P.s. The Chinese “protest” apps are going to mine the FUCK out of these millions of phones in the brief window they have them. Also, when the kids inevitably move back to tiktok, majority of them will leave these other apps installed on their phones, dormant and collecting in the background.

    • Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      Why does Trump need to pretend to do something for you?

      Trump has your support no matter what. He will rape children but you’ll line up to vote for him.

      With that said he’s already in office. Your opinion is meaningless to him. He already got what he needed from you.

  • peanutyam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Be better if it was just banned worldwide period and the “TikTok influencer” crowd can go get real jobs and perhaps users can improve their attention spans again.

    yawn

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Do you want to help a company that kisses Trump’s asshole or do you want to find the next free app that does the same thing as TikTok?

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 seconds ago

      It’s more of an IG replacement than a TikTok replacement, but I’ve been kinda enjoying Pixelfed for the past week or so. It’s slow right now but that should change I imagine. The huge influx of users needs to be managed prior to optimization.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      I was spamming info about ActivityPub… found out there is a delay timer if you post too many comments lol.

  • sunglocto@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I know bad for democracy and everything but

    This app has done nothing positive for my life, arguably began my social media addiction, filled my brain with negative content at the height of COVID and severely impacted my mental health

    I don’t think governments should ban platforns. But do I think TikTok should have ever existed? No

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I dunno. Thanks to Black creators there, I learned about Tulsa, Rosewood, a lot about America indigenous culture, learned about the cops city protests and actions…

      Sounds like TikTok was very good for democracy.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        I find Tiktok haters funny. Vast majority aren’t users, and when you do find a user and they disparage the content, it’s pretty obvious that it’s a them problem and not a tiktok problem.

        If you want tiktok to be cooking videos, just like nothing but cooking videos. If you want it to be about palestine, then like that content. If you want to be in MAGAtok, well that exists too. If you see nothing but thirst traps, that’s because those are the videos you actually fully watch. Your fyp page is just a mirror into yourself.

        The only haters I can agree with are the ones who say “too many ads”

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If not for TikTok Israel’s genocide would have gone unreported in Western media and censored on US social media.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I don’t use TikTok but I knew plenty about Israel’s actions. It was all over the internet and plenty of news sources.

        • ScoopMcPoops@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah because teens love opening the paper in the morning and reading about how Israel is “liberating” Palestine?

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Surreal watching the rest of the internet freaking out. Meanwhile we are just sitting here on our own platforms doing our own things.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Personally, I never saw the appeal of TikTok anyway.

      Then again I also was never interested in Twitter.

      I guess my attention span isn’t short enough for that type of sites.

      • ScoopMcPoops@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You talk like a redditor, someone who needs people to hear their opinion even if it doesnt add anything.

      • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I wouldn’t say that I don’t see the appeal of it. I would probably get sucked right in if I gave it a shot. It’s a consciouss decision on my part to simply not do that. I don’t not-consume short-form media because I’m better than the people who do, I prohibit it from myself.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Drag gave youtube shorts a try when it came out, and then installed an extension to disable them because they’re boring.

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I would scroll a bit after someone linked me a video. Content was fun, but after like 3 minutes, I could feel something wrong in my brain. Like just the nonstop influx of content with no breaks. You might think one video was faked, but you didn’t have enough time to contemplate it before another shows up in its place.

        I have some friends who spend hours on it. I can’t imagine deciding to participate in that for so long.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Short video formats on all platforms make me very quickly feel like I’m going crazy. Just one voice after another, trying to cram whatever they have to say into your ears, or one joke taken out of context, or one simplistic moral, or absurdist humor that wouldn’t hold up for longer than a few seconds. My partner watches endless “reels” on Facebook, and that hurried talking they all do, with all those cuts to make sure there’s no gap between words, makes me fell very weird and agitated. It’s like everyone has the same voice. And then it keeps looping. I waste far too much time on Lemmy but the short video stuff seems like another level of brain melt.

      • ramirezmike@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        TikTok has tons of issues but this bugs me so much. There are many examples of people sharing their creativity, their skill, their knowledge, their passion to the world on tiktok and it’s so good at exposing you to it if you are interested in seeing all kinds of people expressing themselves.

        Since when does the value of content correlate directly with the amount of time it consumes?

        is brevity no longer the soul of wit??

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Tiktok ban is a good opportunity to educate the common folk on the benefits of federation

      Although I am not sure if short video format addicts’ needs can be fixed with this elegant solution but it definitely works well enough as reddit and twitter replacement.

      • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t see how this has anything to do with federated platforms. I’d argue that watching Loops is just as bad for one’s mental health than TikTok is.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Shit ain’t free!

          But text is cheap enough to make text base federated social media a thing. So freedom oriented plebs have a refuge.

          • ScoopMcPoops@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            “Other social media bad and dumb, my social media good and smart”.

            You’re the same as anyone on Facebook or Twitter, you love you’re little echo chamber and nothing is wrong with it and the other ones are bad.

      • Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s called Instagram or YouTube Shorts. Same thing…TikTok offered nothing new. And I’m here, but all I see on Lemmy are the same posts 3-4 times, predictable pearl clutching reactions to everything, and very limited news coverage with a proclivity for posting random, fringe sources

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          Those were both responses to TikTok shredding revenues for those services.

          It’s a huge reason for the TikTok ban: meta and Google have no real good counter to.it, due to first-man-in factor.

        • kronisk @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You have a point. It felt different when I signed up but now all the most upvoted content here seems to be screenshots from Twitter, regurgitated memes and similar low-effort dopamine triggers. And when I left reddit it was mostly reposted TikTok reels anyway. Cognitive fast food that’s easy to lose yourself in but unhealthy and unfulfilling as a habit. Lemmy doesn’t really have many niche communities to outweigh the slop either. Consequently, I spend less time here as well. Which is probably a good thing.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I don’t respect corporate trash… But if it works for you, great!

          Make sure to have location sharing enabled;)

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    And now Trump gets to be the one who saved TikTok, despite starting the process.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s an own-goal for Biden - an unpopular law that starts being enforced the day before Trump gets to stop enforcing it.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        No one is enforcing it, it’s a play by TikTok. TikTok did it voluntarily. The server is still there, my wife logged in and saw the notice.

        It’s just theater.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          No one is enforcing it, it’s a play by TikTok. TikTok did it voluntarily

          Yup. In fact, Biden had specifically said he will not enforce the ban.

          Which, incidentally…might be the same thing Trump does to “unban TikTok” once he takes office. Which is bizarre, on both sides. Like…that’s literally not legal for a president to do. They can’t legally just ignore an Act of Congress.

          Not that the law matters in America anymore. The Supreme Court has pretty definitively seen to that.

          • adarza@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            enforcement is up to the ag, so yea. they could just ‘ignore’ the law.

            the only thing the ‘president’ can do is extend the deadline by 90 days given evidence that the company is closing-in on a deal.

            with scotus out of the way, ruling in favor of trump’s initial desires, and that which subsequently passed through congress; it is now up to congress to undo the legislation if they so choose.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 hours ago

              enforcement is up to the ag, so yea. they could just ‘ignore’ the law.

              In practice, there’s no real mechanism to force it (especially if Congress is unwilling to impeach & convict). But legally speaking, the Take Care clause of the constitution obligates the President (through his executive) to enforce all laws passed by Congress. Ignoring it would be unconstitutional.

          • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            The executive branch can selectively enforce laws, look at all the weed dispensaries the feds could just waltz into and have a federal case against everyone.

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          TikTok and its service providers are liable. “No one is enforcing” is meaningless, because they can still be prosecuted retrospectively if the US Government changes its mind.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        As designed by the republicans. There are legitimate reasons to regulate tiktok, if Biden opposed though, they’d say he was a weak Chinese sympathizer, if he complied, they’d do this.

        It was a trap where you were fucked either way, as the republican think tank ghouls drew it out.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Not sure why you think it’s an own goal. Biden didn’t set the day for it to take effect, that was written into the law by Congress. You could say it was an own goal because Biden announced he wasn’t going to enforce it, but that seems to be the opposite of what you’re trting to claim And even with that decision to not enforce the law for 1 day before the Trump admin takes over, none of the companies TikTok works with like Apple or Google to list it in the app stores gave a shit about that lack of enforcement because of the uncertainty.

        Not to mention Trump being the start of the ban in the first place. He was President when all of this started to work it’s way through the process, even if Biden was the President when it actually made it through Congress, with bipartisan support. Trump only changed positions because he wants TokTok to pay him to continue to allow it to continue.

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 hours ago

          More Americans have TikTok accounts than vote. For a shitload of normies who have only the vaguest notion of politics and current affairs, the app they’ve been enjoying gets cut off as the defining event of the waning days of the Biden administration. They are not going to care about how Trump tried to do it first, or it was bipartisan, or whatever. It’s hard not to see how this will cost Dems dearly.

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            No it won’t. Biden is already out of office as far as normies are concerned. He has been since the election, but definitely within 24 hours of inauguration. TikTok stops working and the next thing they see is Trump having a huge party with a shit ton of pomp and circumstance for his inauguration as he gets into the White House. And then TikTok still doesn’t work when they open it up. Maybe he brings it back, maybe he doesn’t. Voters don’t pay enough attention to separate his inauguration and the TikTok ban happening 24 hours apart, they’ll bundle it together as one event.

            Unless he gets a massive cash infusion from Bytedance in the next 24 hours, he won’t give TikTok an extension on day one in office. He’s the kind of person that expects his payment up front.

            So everyone will instead see it stop working as President Trump takes over, and then it continuing to not work after. Some may give him the benefit of the doubt, but they weren’t ever going to vote for anyone else anyway, he’s their God Emperor President and they’ve confirmed their world view around him being perfect.

            Heck, he might try to spin it as some sort of promotional opportunity for Truth Social.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              The law isn’t being enforced. TikTok can just put it back up tomorrow and imply it was Trump that did it.

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                That won’t stop Apple and Google from keeping it pulled from app stores until things are more concrete.

                TikTok only blocked access and put that notice up in the app after their partners decided that a statement from the outgoing administration 24 before the transition wasn’t enough for them to not comply with the law.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      There’s still loads of bullshit surrounding the name. Hope your personal filters are up to the task the next 4 years.

  • Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    What I find mad is that people are seriously depressed about this on /r/Tiktok. Yeah sure, I understand small creators now having a tough time having their business disappearing, but people are literally saying that TikTok was their only source of information and that they don’t know what to do now??

    • ScoopMcPoops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Tik tok had some amazing news sources. I’d say the Washington Post on there was pretty good, they actually reported on the bullshit going on at the paper as well. There was a lot of great sources on the app. I’ll say that tiktok is the only place you’ll see news on Palestine not from the pov of Israel.

      • cocomutative_diagram@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        I am only on mastodon and lemmy, yet I have only seen things from pro-palestan standpoint.

        Believe it or not, building a ethical platform will encourage ethical news on there. Unethical platform might sometimes push ethical news, but eventually will only prioritize its own agenda.

    • EDC3ee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      TikTok had a lot of great independent journalists on the app. I personally got a lot of good information from people on the ground about issues that I didn’t see talked about anywhere else on the Internet.

    • Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      Those people are too dumb for their own good. They were destined for failure no matter what.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      So the ban is reaching exactly the people it was set out to reach. Good.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Given the amount of nonsense that was on tiktok they’ll probably be more informed now.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It is a nice asset why shouldnt an American oligarch own it though

      Democracy, free market, and capitalism 🤡

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The entirety of global capitalism is lining up to bend the knee and gargle fascist balls.

      This is what leftists have been warning forever. Capitalism wants the monopolies, bailouts — the political, financial and military backing, etc — that state-capitalist dictatorships provide. Democratically elected governments, acting in the interests of the people, are really the only threat to the corporate oligarchies wealth and power.

      All of the wests “enemies” are equally supportive of fascism, because state-capitalist dictators are easier to influence (bribe).