• LiPoly@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s like saying “people share photos and videos all the time on Twitter. What is the difference with Instagram?”

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Everything on Fedi is just different interfaces and perf from the user perspective.

      People want to continue to use something close to Instagram, Facebook, Reddit, Twitter but not be locked to their enshitified companies who decide what they get to see.

      Many that come over find out there’s no algorithm and that they have to follow people to get any content, they find they miss the doom scroll and go straight back.

    • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Better UI and a better discover page mainly. Plus it’s gotten a lot of organic advertising just from luck and people talking about it, and no obvious competitor like Bluesky

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Yes. No transcoding, but that’s actually a feature as far as I’m concerned.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah but pixelfed is coming out with loops, it’s been on beta for awhile, that is basically Tik Tok with no ads or government/big tech ownership. I personally feel like that could have taken a giant chunk of the Tik Tok users and kept them from having to learn to read ideograms to access content they wanted. I don’t personally use that format of social media but I tried it on Android and it looks just like Tik Tok looked that I have seen on others devices.

      • 03ari@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The only reason why no company could take over TikTok is their algorithm, its the worst yet the best part of the app, since you only see stuff you like, without having to search for similar accounts. I’ve been feeling lonely on the Fedi compared to other socials

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah, discoverability is work on Fedi, unfortunately most people would rather consume algo content from a bad source then work to find good people to follow.

          Everything is open, I suspect if we REALLY wanted to we could make an indexing service to help surface content based on preferences, but then that’s a high value target for corporate America to farm. Also it would be pretty expensive to pay for it :)

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I just can’t imagine who will pay for that sort of reach. It’s incredibly expensive for self hosting operations like TikTok. I’d imagine it’d be outrageous without a CDN.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’d imagine it’d be outrageous without a CDN.

          The idea is you’d have dozens or hundreds of people hosting loops and they’d each spread the cost among them and get funded by followers and philanthropists. Most lemmy instances use CDN, but it’s nowhere near as heavy media-wise.

          You could also go the Peertube route and have the client share what you’re watching with other people torrent style.

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yes and the same developer does Loops, the TikTok “equivalent”

      Not sure when he sleeps

    • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Yes.

      -Instagram has pixelfed. -Reddit has lemmy -X has Mastodon/Misskey/Pleroma (&forks…) -Tiktok has loops (app still super rough around the edges and sadly on limited to one instance rather than having its own software from what i understand) -Youtube has peertube (so far the least used i think)

      • TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yea peertube is rough… Mostly in part due to, in my opinion at least, people wanting to make use of YouTube’s ad revenue system even tho most creators I watch making most of their income via donations rather than ad revenue.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Microblogging is covered by Mastodon and Pleroma. People there could easily use them for the same content. There are a ton of options to crosspost tumblr to Mastodon.

          The biggest problem is discovery on Tumblr is a LOT easier than Mastodon, you have to advertise and advocate for yourself

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            lmao. Bot got drag to make an account and tried to teach drag, and drag still doesn’t get it either. Bot can explain.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I can’t wait for peertube to take off. I think of all of the social medias, youtube has the most enduring monopoly, because hosting is such a huge barrier it’s got even more of a natural monopoly than regular social media.

        I think once peertube can start ascending that might be the ballgame for decentralised social media in general.

        • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Exactly!! YouTube is by far the best “social” platform (or least shit) and sadly the strongest monopoly. Cus what the fuck is a newly made competitor gonna do? Rip all YouTube videos and host them? People on IG and X etc don’t really go around looking at old posts, those places are more for looking at what’s new and such. On YouTube however its entirely game that u find a dope edutainment video from years ago that you happen to vibe with.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 hours ago

            That is very true, and I think some kind of archive is going to be important eventually. I think to get around the hosting costs, one method could be for peertube instances to form a union of instances for collective purchases, because the cost goes down with scale.

            With a large enough group you could even split hosting among different providers to prevent a monopoly from forming in the hosting space.

            • TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I think a big part of that is just straight up storage space, more specially a lack thereof. Google won’t release specifics but estimates put the total data stored by YouTube at somewhere near an exabyte (1 million terrabytes). Most of which is made up by video files.

              Of course that’s just issue number 1 of many to figure out.

              • Wiz@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Storage costs keeps getting cheaper, but high quality video keeps taking up more space.

                • TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  It’s a matter of finding where the line between cost and user satisfaction meet.

                  Like sure you could limit all videos to 60fps @ 720p or 30fps @ 1080p but most everyone now wants everything 120fps @ 2160p which takes up dozens of gigs per video and eats up bandwidth.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Does peertube have monetization for creator’s? Because that’s how you get content that most people watch.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Honestly youtube barely has it currently. The vast majority of creators make very little on the platform and rely largely on supporter donations, merch and sponsorships, which could work on any platform.

            By squeezing creators out of every penny they can, youtube has forced people to find other options abd made themselves less and less relevant. I guess that’s enshittification for you.

            You can also gate access to certain videos on peertube, so a nebula-like model might also work eventually.

            • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I’m genuinely confused. Is YouTube even profitable ATP? Hard to imagine it not being so but they’ve been doubling down on squeezing out every coin they can, trying to fight adblock is one example, pushing out more ads too. Wtf even is going on over there.

              • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Different metrics on profitability. Are you judging their hosting costs on how much it actually costs Google to add more in their already existing data centers for YouTube like a good vertically integrated monopoly or are you judging their hosting costs on how much their google cloud bill would be. You’ll get wildly different numbers depending on the method.

      • 3dmvr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I dont understand how to join or post on peertube, its the most confusing, do you host your own, is there a feed of all the servers?

        • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You just pick an instance and join it, sadly i don’t think it has enough federation yet so its entirely possible u just chose a bad instance and have amazing creators sitting on other instances yours isn’t federated with

          • 3dmvr@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            If you f up and join lemmy.dbzero you wont see any posts from lemmyworld users and the same issue if you join the other

            • imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              That’s actually not true. Lemmy.world and lemmy.dbzer0.com are fully federated, you can see for yourself if you check the instances tab.

              The only thing that people incessantly complain about is that lemmy.world blocked one single community from dbzer0, the piracy community. For an account on lemmy.dbzer0, that has absolutely no effect. For an account on lemmy.world, that just means they need an alt if they want to participate in that one community. The two userbases can still fully interact all over lemmy, it’s just that lemmy.world decided to block the piracy community to cover their asses legally.

              Look, here’s https://lemmy.world/c/adhd@lemmy.dbzer0.com

              But people make such a big deal about that one blocked community that a lot of people get the idea that they are defederated or something. You’re not the first person I’ve had to correct about this, not even the first this week lol.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    348
    ·
    24 hours ago

    When a fediverse app wins, the whole fediverse wins. A rising tide lifts all ships or however it goes.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    My feed on Pixelfed is way better the second week, now that I’ve followed a couple dozen folks and put some posts out there.

    And pro tip: Post and tag a cute picture of your pet and people will see your account.

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      They need some starter packs like BlueSky because all I’m seeing are some art photography highly likely ai generated - and I have no idea where to find content that has any value. On searching the hashtags I’m getting mastodon posts containing links that can’t be clicked.

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 minutes ago

        Mastodon has third-party starter packs now. I wonder if it works for Pixelfed?

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I thought that my first couple of days, but TBH, I actually really like that Fedi social media is completely self-directed. Not having the Jack Dorseys, Donald Trumps, and Zuckerbergs of the world vomiting content or stupid ads onto my feed is well worth the modicum of extra effort.

        I found half of the people I’m following just by posting a picture of my dog and tagging it #CuteAnimals, and that got a nice response. I do follow a few hashtags and found follows there, but I will probably take them off once I’m up to 30-40 follows and I like my feed.

      • bufalo1973@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Search with the magnifying glass icon. In Discover maybe you can find something.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    One question, does LBRY (The protocol powering Odysee) count as something Federated ?

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There was a github request to integrate lbry into fedi, but it never gained any traction.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fediverse#/media/File:A_view_into_the_Fediverse.png

      So, no, they’re not in the fediverse and don’t interconnect with the other players.

      Here are the current places that play well together.

      Odysee had a shot at making it bigger than it was, but it’s really drowning in bad (moral and qualty) content. They never really recovered from their crypto scheme, once the SEC started looking into them, they got screwed. I’m down with the idea of paying creators in crypto, but they were selling it as a security.

    • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Does Odysee even use LBRY anymore? They abandoned the desktop app a while ago and I’m not sure how else you can use the protocol

      (if so, then assuming everything is on Odysee then it’s about as federated as Bluesky)

  • OpenStars@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    205
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    People like looking at photos of food and cats more than being railed for having "incorrect* political viewpoints? (/s for anyone not picking up on that btw:-P)

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I literally just got called a snowflake in another thread for saying people should stop posting US politics in general communities. People still wonder why Lemmy has a bad reputation even in the entire Fediverse… Sometimes I wonder why I still bother here.

        • Kyouki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Or the vast majority of political spam from only one country. I’d like more of a worldview. Be interesting to see how others have other problems and how it might be solved with other solutions.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t disagree it’s an issue, but what should be allowed in general communities? If any other nation’s politics are allowed, then you can’t really just not allow US politics (unless you make that a rule for the community and part of its purpose, which is fine).

        There are just more Americans here than any particular other nationality, so you get more US content on average. You’ll need specific non-US communities if you want to avoid it. Expecting general communities to not reflect the general audience is a little absurd.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Someone called you a snowflake? Ok…uh, I’ll call you a carrot.

        But also, I don’t understand the rules for this game. It’s a snowman game, right?

      • OpenStars@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guess I am a snowflake too then, bc to me consent should matter. And while the USA is a part of the world, and also has an oversized effect upon it due to the size of the economy and trade deals and the like, it also can be overwhelming for some, who feel ostracized and left out as if only the big guys (and guns) matter.

        But on the other hand, it is known that moderation sucks across the vast majority of Lemmy - it’s somewhat baked right into the tools themselves, e.g. removing whole posts rather than merely taking them out of the community lists but allowing people to continue their discussions already begun, as Reddit does.

        So you may want to take it upon yourself to either start blocking by keywords (maybe find an app that allows that - I’m not sure which ones), or user accounts that do that, or even find a better community to engage with.

        Though I agree with your conclusion: I no longer recommend Lemmy to people irl by virtue of having been burned by that far too many times before. We’re toxic AF in this Alt-Left (rather than Alt-Right) “Nazi bar” space, and a lot of the people here are legit those banned from Reddit for exactly that behavior.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 day ago

        I just got called a rapist! For asking wtf she was wearing, fashion wise. (On a non rape story just to be clear). I also wonder why I’m still here. Y’all need to be better.

        • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Looking at the comments, I can see how your comment got misinterpreted. I do believe you had no such intention, but the way it was worded (especially the last word, ‘anyway’) makes it sound out of context as if you were victim blaming. And from the number of votes, it’s obvious many see it that way. Rather than get mad at randos on the internet, why not just reflect that you might have written that in a somewhat confusing way, and clarify it? Without escalating.

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            I can see. But if people have a choice to interpret something as 1) that a question about fashion is in fact an innocuous question about fashion, or 2) that he’s obviously a rapist and victim blaming and I’m going to call him a rapist (when the entire tone of the thread and community is not serious), the problem that I see is that Lemmy is quick to misinterpret in the worst way possible.

            And oddly enough, he was the person to escalate with that accusation, and I was the one to explain it.

            • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              22 hours ago

              if people have a choice to interpret something as 1) that a question about fashion is in fact an innocuous question about fashion, or 2) that he’s obviously a rapist and victim blaming and I’m going to call him a rapist (when the entire tone of the thread and community is not serious)

              That’s on the assumption that the reader sees both possible meanings, though. Most people don’t do that, the first meaning that comes to mind is the one we go with. It’s a very rare person that will, without external prompting, go ‘I wonder if he meant something else?’.

              And oddly enough, he was the person to escalate with that explanation, and I was the one to explain it.

              From his POV, you had already escalated. Yeah it was due to his misunderstanding. But at that point you were the one with a choice as to whether to nicely explain your actual original meaning, (and maybe edit the confusing line?) or just rage about everybody on Lemmy being quick to assume the worst. Nobody’s the asshole here, it was a misunderstanding, but you could have chosen to make it better :)

              • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                If someone can’t see what the literal words say then… there are bigger problems. Which may actually explain things.

                It’s odd that you think I raged. I observed.

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          Yeah as expected I went and checked the comment in question and you are definitely misrepresenting it. You are omitting the context of the post, which is like…the entire fucking problem.

          The amount of times I see people go “I was banned for literally no reason!” and the like only to discover they’re not being exactly truthful is staggering.

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            24 hours ago

            The context of the post: 196 which is essentially a shit posting and take nothing serious community. Yeah that context. And that it was a straight question about what she was wearing, fashion wise since you really need to hear it. So thank you for demonstrating the exact problem!

            • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              You know I just read an interesting piece about how Musk deploys plausible deniability - or rather attempts to. He thinks he’s clever and he isn’t.

              I know what 196 is. The context is the image. You really can’t see any reason why you got that reaction? Really and truly?

              • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                Reaction? If you see a simple question in a shitposting community, with the image of a fashion choice that is unconventional, and think “Hmm should I interpret this as a question about fashion as he asked, or should I interpret this as he’s a rapist and trying to be clever about it”, if you default to thinking that the other person is obviously a rapist (as you seem to have, saying that I’m seeking plausible deniability and try to associate me with Musk and trying to be clever with rape lol), then holy fuck, and frankly that’s on you. That was your reaction. Like you have to really out there to default to “he’s obviously a rapist”. You need to be better.

                Honestly this is the perfect example of how Lemmy has a ravenous need to misinterpret. You just did it yourself.

                • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 hours ago

                  This is such a reach dude. Also her outfit is far from “unconventional.“ But I’m not gonna get bogged down in the weeds of that one.

                  I remember somebody tried to talk to me recently about the economics of the third Reich without talking about the war. At some point you’re just ignoring what’s in front of you to the point where it’s dishonest.

                  You’re having a very real principal Skinner moment here. A lot of people are telling you the issue, yet you are hell bent on hiding behind intention. Unfortunately intention is not enough. Especially when you double down in the face of valid critiques.

                  I know you don’t want advice from me but I’m going to give it anyway: take a beat, step away from this conversation, then come back and think about why people may have had a negative reaction to what you said. There is an important lesson here you can pick up if you want to.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          You were just joking around, right? Well, perhaps they were too. If you want it assumed about you, perhaps go ahead and assume it about then. That way, even if the former does not happen, at least you will definitely have the moral high ground regardless. Now, what was it that Obi Wan always says about the high ground…? :-P

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            LOL no I wasn’t joking around (about rape or anything else). It was a legit, straightforward question about fashion. And no he wasn’t joking, it was a pretty clear accusation.

        • simple@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          This place just needs better moderation. I’ve said this multiple times before but there is a serious lack of moderation and most admins go dark for long periods of time. Make it clear this behavior isn’t okay, ban people who run their mouth, and remove low-effort posts.

      • OpenStars@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Oh excuse me, while I convert my entire personality to incorporate that energy…

        There, done! I am now okay with murdering anyone who is okay with, ah… murdering a uh… wait, I may see a problem here.:-P