• model_tar_gz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You, and nobody can stop them from doing so. It turns out that web UI technologies are very easily and conveniently usable for OS GUI features as well. Browsing a file system? Web UI. Navigating settings and configurations pages? Web UI.

    And these browsers are open-source. Chromium. Edge is a derivative of Chromium, so is Chrome. The fact that Google controls the Chromium upstream matters not at all, because anyone is free to fork it and modify to their needs.

    Freedom is a double-edged sword, but this is many folds better than locked-in proprietary.

    • diviledabit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course they can be forced to provide a browser selection screen when installing the OS. What are you even talking about technology for, this is a regulatory issue.

      • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        His point is that the browser is integral to the functioning of the phones OS and is a decision that the consumer makes when they purchase a phone.

        Your suggestion is akin to demanding the right to buy a Honda with a Toyota engine installed by the dealer.

        • diviledabit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think that’s even true, but even if it were they could still present the user with a choice for the browser they use to browse the web and keep the integrated browser for those tasks.

          I have a Google pixel 7 and I use Firefox and I disabled Google Chrome, for example.

          I’ve had Samsung’s and used Firefox and disabled Samsung internet.