YouTube will now direct you to the right first-aid videos during an emergency | Searching YouTube for advice on CPR, heart attacks, or other critical health emergencies will now highlight authorita…::A YouTube shelf of first-aid advice for acute health emergencies from legit sources is now set up to provide advice on topics like heart attack, CPR, choking, or stroke.

  • vexikron@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Before our Top 5 most important CPR steps, a quick word from our sponsor, BetterHealth.

    Times are hard, and you might be sad. BetterHealth is here for you, with overpriced and underqualified ‘therapists’ whose job it is to sit down and talk to very sad people about why and how they are sad, for hours upon hours, for little pay. Whats even better is there is basically no chance that this will occur to you, that basically our service is just a call center staffed by underpaid and overworked employees or contractors, because you are a sad person who uses therapy from a phone app, as you are likely too jaded to actually talk to anyone face to face and too exhausted to do any critical thinking. Sign up today and dont forget, or maybe dont remember to cancel the automatic subscription we willnsign you up for. And dont worry, theres no way for you to verify the actual integrity, track record, or any possible malpractice claims against our therapists because, well, only paranoid people check such things, and only truly crazy people cannot be helped by our dedicated call center slaves. Better Health. For your Health!

    ALRIGHT YOUTUBERS its time for CPR step 1:

    Don’t waste any time in ensuring the victim’s airway is not obstructed…

    • wabafee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You forgot about a background about CPR, it’s uses then proceed a whole essay about its history, then eventually reaching to the main point but explained in the most vague way possible. It’s also probably narrated by an AI.

    • hefty4871@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey guys! It’s me EverydayCPRTips back again with an exciting video on how to perform life saving CPR. Before we get started, don’t forget to compress that like button and breathe some love into that bell so you can be notified anytime I release a new video. Leave a comment below if you’d like to see any other life saving techniques!

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean could we sort the results by likes/dislikes? I don’t remember that being a thing but maybe I am misremembering. Like usually it was “relevancy” whatever is that or views.

      So yeah you could ignore from the result the ones with a lot of disliked but I don’t think we had other than that.

      Of course they could have implemented that as well.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remember that Youtube works specifically on engagement, which is why everyone gets thrown down the right-wing rabbit hole automatically. They disabled the downvote because it meant less ad revenue for Google since there were videos that people weren’t watching.

      • Madis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dislikes are no longer publicly visible, unless you use an extension (which would use mostly crowdsourced or interpolated data). There are extensions that show the likes/dislikes before clicking the video, but you cannot sort by it.

    • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, because thumbs up and down has never ever led to shitty content.

      Highlighting actual experts is a far better system.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We should have some faith in our official institution but were all human. If anything being an expert can make people more prone to serious mistakes because of bias.

        Its in everyone interested for the public to speak up fast if official information is wrong or dangerous.

        The downvote thing is an old issue though. I actually see many other problems but believe it will still end up a net plus.

        My main concern is who choses the expert? Will it be a local one? in the users own language? Or will YouTube hire their own experts to make these videos themselves.

        What do they do if doctors cant agree on a best method but multiple methods have videos online?

      • rab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean you can still see dislikes with the browser extension, can you link even a single video that’s “shitty content” that doesn’t have a ton of dislikes?

        People aren’t stupid and like/dislike is a good system

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        lol yet here you are participating in a system that you apparently think is shitty lol

  • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s kind of funny how the enshittification of YouTube (and Google searches) is so bad, and so widely recognized, that YouTube giving the results you asked for—IF you’re having a medical emergency—is considered newsworthy.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also consider how long YouTube has been around and under the control of Google. And this is just happening. Why wasn’t this done 10 years ago…

  • FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure how I feel about the authorities being alerted. What if someone is kinda bored and is looking for videos for educational use.

    Edit: ok I read the headline wrong. Oops

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I may be reading it wrong but this is just not what the article says.

      By “highlight authoritative sources” they mean display credible videos made by the authorities at the very top of the search results.

      And within the article you’ll read that one of the first instructions given in said videos is to call an emergency service, and not that youtube is going to do it for you

    • Madis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where does it say that? The article only mentions authoritative videos, which means they have been made or approved by authorities, not that watching the videos will interact with them in any way.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Guess it’s better than making me sit through an ad first, but is this really that big of news otherwise?

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Baby steps towards a return of curated truthful content? Nah, just CYA so they don’t get sued.