• HelixDab@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Centralization has another aspect that is simultaneously both good and bad: you can easily remove offensive content and problematic users. A centralized approach makes it very easy to remove cancerous people, groups, and content, while a decentralized approach makes that far harder. But in a centralized system, who defines what is cancerous content, et al.? Reddit did a great job at removing racist content, for instance (or, if you go back farther, they removed ‘jailbait’ and ‘creepshots’ communities, which were producing content that was just on the line of being obscene). But they also took a “both sides are bad” approach when it came to literal nazis v. antifascists.

    I’m a Reddit refugee, so it’s going to take me a while to learn to navigate this. And yeah, I’ve been kicked off Twitter, so Mastodon was already on my radar.

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I believe disassociating from Nazis, CSAM, etc is still very possible in a distributed network like this, the instance admin just blacklists the instances they don’t want to interact with. But it requires the user to find the server that best aligns with what they want to see. A centralized admin won’t do it for them.