Incandescent light bulbs are officially banned in the U.S.::America’s ban on incandescent light bulbs, 16 years in the making, is finally a reality. Well, mostly.

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because they’re driven entirely by emotion, not rationality. They were told to be angry about it, so they are. Plus, Biden or something.

    • WEE_WOO@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Something about limiting consumer choice, but everyone purchased LED bulbs to begin with anyways…

    • beigegull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because imagining that someone might have a legitimate reason to want a product or service that a regulator might not have thought of is currently a “Republican” trait in the US.

      • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Does anybody use incandescent light bulbs as radiators? Because it’s the only alternative use I can think of.

        In the European Union we banned them 10 years ago and people just continued their lives. I wish people were as mad when books get banned, but sadly it’s not the case

        • beigegull@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Does anybody use incandescent light bulbs as radiators?

          Yes. I’ve done it personally a couple times.

          Because it’s the only alternative use I can think of.

          The thing about alternative uses is that they’re still real even if you can’t think of them.

          Broad bans are a bad policy tool in general. Even if you believe in the progressive ideal of expert regulators making broad societal policies, a simple thought experiment shows the problem: What would it take to do the study to accurately determine all the negative effects of a ban? Not guessing, not wishful thinking, but really collecting and analyzing the information.

          I wish people were as mad when books get banned, but sadly it’s not the case

          When was the last time the US federal government banned a book?