The city of Bountiful, Utah voted to build a $48 million fiber network to provide affordable gigabit broadband for its residents and businesses. Regional internet providers Comcast and CenturyLink opposed the plan and tried to force a public vote through a taxpayer group they fund. However, communities often build their own networks because existing options are inadequate. Data shows that community-owned networks provide better, faster, cheaper service than monopolies. While big internet providers claim community networks are a boondoggle, they are just another business plan that often succeeds due to quality proposals and local accountability. Comcast and CenturyLink did not want to provide the high-speed internet Bountiful needed, but also tried to block the city from doing so itself.


You love to see it. Do you have community Internet available where you live?

  • UnfortunateTwist@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    My area is stuck with the illusion of choice between Comcast cable and AT&T DSL.

    That’s wonderful news for Bountiful. Quite a $48m middle finger to these monopolies.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t believe someone living in US got stuck with DSL while my parents who live in a village in Sumatra actually got fiber optic service. Your area got a worse deal than a village in a third world country. Why aren’t you guys revolting?

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          So is Indonesia, 3,181mi x 1,094mi (vs US continental 2,802mi x 1,650mi), and split into multiple large landmass too, which requires extensive sea cable network. Yet they managed to build extensive fiber optics coverage in the past 10 years.