• MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      The solutions here don’t seem to really be solutions in my opinion, especially the third one. It’s like if the problem a patent solves was “being able to individually package sandwiches on a conveyor belt” and the solution was “have a machine that recognizes where one sandwich ends and another begins so it can stop and start packaging appropriately.” Like, no kidding, but how?

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hold my bacon, one can patent the idea that a game character switches mounts depending on a given state? (Image 3)

      • Yuki@kutsuya.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Seems like it. So when you come down from the sky on your flying mount and get close to the ground, you swap to a horse mount for example.

        How can one patent this… wtf!

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Software patents are fucked, ain’t they? You can implement a thing using completely different code, algorithms, hell even programming languages/CPU architectures, and you’d still be infringing. There was some stupid fight over a simple slider UI element to unlock a phone a few years back.

        • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yeah software patents should be like “this exact code” or something along these lines. I mean patenting “hello world” should give you billions

    • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      Looking through the first one’s content and it seems reasonable? The patent’s abstract is supposed to be as widely applicable as legally permitted, so it’s like a completely different language on top of legalese.