Buy software, once Say goodbye to subscription fatigue! Discover software you can buy once and own forever–no recurring charges, just tools that work for you, for life.

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    If you’re into music production, FL Studio has a lifetime license that’s stood the test of time, and has kept up with or exceeded the capabilities of packages like Reason, Ableton, and Logic. It was the first to really embrace an open VST plugin interface, and has so many options that even after 25 years I haven’t yet explored them all. It also comes with a ton of free instruments you can download (basically free DLC).

    I picked up a lifetime license for $99 in 2001 when it was Fruity Loops 2.0. Used it for 10 years as it evolved and was amazed that it was keeping up with the big boys. That encouraged me to drop another $80 to upgrade to the producer edition to start making professional level tracks - and I was not disappointed.

    The best part? The base license is still just $99. Producer edition is still $179.

    EDIT: side note - the demo is actually the full software package, so you can try it out for free. The license just unlocks the capacity to save projects with the plugins that are covered by your licensing.

    • pyr0ball@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Bruh I’m still using my fls 11 license from the early '00’s and it still works. Modern hardware has made it work even better really

      • arotrios@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        FL 11 was an amazing piece of software - that’s the version that really kicked it into the big leagues.

        You should check out the newest version - the download manager is much better since FL Studio 20, and they’ve got a bunch of new packages and plugins. The Flex plugin is one of the best traditional instrument synths I’ve ever worked with (think it came in on v 17 or 18).

        Even the new version has excellent performance on my 10 year old desktop - you’ll love it when you get a chance to upgrade.

  • GVeltaine@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I use moneydance for finance, it’s $50 for the current version, as of now they give you one free version upgrade, with no requirement to upgrade again if you are satisfied.

    It has a learning curve and isn’t the prettiest but I’ve been satisfied with managing my transactions and running reports.

    What it lacks though is a decent budget extension.

  • Geodad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    2 days ago

    Discover FOSS software. Just be sure to toss some donations to your favorite projects.

    • Rin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Imma be straight up. Donations are cool but not a lot of people give donations. partly because some are skint (i used to be) but mainly because people just don’t know.

      i feel like the biggest issue that foss projects face is the fact that they don’t ask for donations in a way that the average user knows about. Kde sends a notification around christmas asking for donos. I haven’t seen any other foss app do anything similar.

      • cageythree@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        I give donations, but way less than I’d like (less in terms of quantity of recipients, not the total financial quantity).

        What I’d love (not only for FOSS, but also stuff like podcasts and other things I’m donating to regularly) would be a service where I can set a budget and select the software and tools I use and it splits it up automatically.

        I don’t mind donating, but I hate managing it, having dozens of small transactions for it, and I feel like I’m forgetting to donate to like 90+% of the stuff I’m using. Also, with payment provider’s fees it’s often not worth it to donate <1€ a month, so bundling transactions would be way more effective - for me as the user as well as the recipients who’d get one transaction once a month from said service rather than hundreds of small ones.

        I never really understood why e.g. Patreon doesn’t offer this. You can’t expect perks with this because the perks probably will start higher than what’s the breakdown of each recipient woild be at a reasonable budget, but the advantage would be that (mostly) everyone would get a piece of your cake, rather than like 5 of the 500 different creators/developers/… you’re using content/software of. Also, you could reduce or increase the monthly budget depending on your financial situation, rather than cancelling or modifying dozens of small subscriptions.

        • Rin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I understand that but think about it. As a Linux user, i don’t go to dowload pages. I simply apt install or pacman -S or change my configuration.nix. I will never see that donate button unless I go to the project’s page.

          • Geodad@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            I go to my favorite software’s pages from time to time to see what they’re up to. Also, there are a few pieces that I have to visit the site for news when a non-free dependancy updates.

  • endofline@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Software maintenance does cost a lot, it’s a full time job. Most people don’t pay foss or any at all ( winrar or total commander case ). Most people won’t be able to maintain or adjust foss on their own… Foss doesn’t work forever ( it’s a pain to deeply depend on foss which stops being maintained ). It’s a reality that 1 year fallback license is necessary evil

  • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve bought way too much software that suddenly abandons their product to launch a new subscription based version.

    I’d rather choose FOSS than anything payed.

    • nodiratime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I boycott anything that has to be paid or is non-free.

      I donate regularly to FOSS projects (that I use).

    • rice@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      also nearly all of the stuff on that site looks like garbage that will do exactly what you said.

      and yes I looked at every single program… there aren’t that many

  • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Shady practices.

    They make program/editor pay 99$ to be listed and the link all redirect to a subscribe page sling for an email.

  • melfie@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think paid open source like GPL Blender addons from BlenderMarket, Gumroad, etc. is a good option. You pay for it to support the devs while also owning what you bought.

  • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The IntelliJ products are not exactly “buy once” - if you want updated versions you need to keep paying periodically.

    Not that I think that’s a bad thing necessarily - it doesn’t make sense to expect devs to continue working on something year after year when you’re not paying them for it.

    • nectar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      They are “buy once” in that their licenses include perpetual fallback. Whenever you stop paying, you retain your licenses perpetually

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not whenever, you need to be paying for a year and then then the latest version from a year ago is what you get the perpetual license for

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m happy to pay for software, but I want more than just permission, I want long term security that my investment in the tool will last.

      If IntelliJ would open source their oldest versions, I would make my boss buy me a copy of the newest version every year.

      • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That sounds good on paper, but the chances that someone else will pick up the ball if they abandon it, even if it’s open source, are very slim. If you care about keeping it alive then paying them is a more effective strategy than hoping for random volunteer work by internet strangers.

        You, on the other hand, have good chances of being able to learn new tools. So I think the need for this security is exaggerated.

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m a developer, so my chances are pretty good. But I take your point.

          Even if I weren’t, there’s enough software options out there that I don’t have to pick between paying for proprietary software and living with abandonware.

          So I think the need for this security is exaggerated.

          Of course. I used proprietary software for a long time. Having things I relied on get abandoned got old, but it worked.

          I just expect more from most of my software, now.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fuck paid software, use open source

    It’s not even for the cost of it, I simply refuse to trust any software that is not open because I know they’ll try to fuck me over one way or the other

    • OmgItBurns@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      I understand sentiment after seeing how a lot of tech companies are. The other side of it is this: Developers still have bills to pay. FOSS projects are great, especially if they’re done by a small team and have a supportive community, but there are only a limited number of developers who have a combination of knowledge, skill, free time, and financial capability to truly dedicate themselves to FOSS projects.

      If I could support myself by coding for FOSS projects, I would probably try (hell I just might not be aware of opportunities for this) but that isn’t the reality in front of me.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is possible, for example Evan You did it, but he wrote the third maybe nowadays 2nd most popular SPA framework in Vue.js and he is also doing other things with Vite, but at that point he is basically getting paid by companies too to work on that.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Jellyfin, for one, comes to mind

        Maybe it should be easier for people to donate something to open source software. Maybe on the Linux command line there should be a message from apt that certain projects could use your financial help, of you want to.

        I doubt many people would be pissed if projects just ask for a small donation

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I would welcome a utility that makes it easy to find donate links for my software packages, based on my Apt, Flatpak, and F-Droid package lists.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    own forever

    Ownership implies control - being able to maintain/repair, modify or even resell.

    To be in control of software you need access to it’s source code, and have the right to share changes with others.