OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

  • 30mag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because in practical terms, writers and artists’ livelihoods are being threatened by AIs who were trained on their work without their consent or compensation.

    So, why shouldn’t an author be able to sue another author for reading their book? Or do you think they should be able to sue?

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      AI is not a person. If you replace it with a person in an analogy, that’s a whole different discussion.

      We actually do restrict how tools can engage with artworks all the time. You know, “don’t take pictures”.