• rippersnapper@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’ve said this before and will say it again. The only tech companies that should be allowed to buy Chrome are Canonical and its equivalents.

  • DUMBASS@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    You know how we thought " How could chrome get any worse?" well, we have an answer.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    And if you thought there was some natural end point to enshittification, here’s your evidence that there’s no such thing.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      They don’t want to buy the browser. They want to buy the brand and the users. Chrome makes up over half the browser market. Think of all the data they could extract from Chrome users. It would cost significantly more to fork chromium and grow the user base to a point where they could extract anything valuable from them, and that’s assuming they’d be successful enough to make it happen.

      • TON618@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I like to think if people want whatever it is OpenAI thinks browsers need AI for, the userbase will manifest itself.

  • neclimdul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Great! Now not only can chrome eat all my system memory, it can use all my GPU memory at the same time! It’s genius!

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Likely it’ll use the cloud for processing, you’ll just get really hard-to-opt-out AI features, like “prompt by default” and “AI autocomplete”, which you can only “snooze” as they’ll automatically be turned back on the moment there’s a “great new feature”, like putting a filter on by default on image generators to fool the eye that it’s made by real artists.

  • uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This can’t happen. Not because I think google is doing a wonderful job, but it’s got serious market share now. Basically a monopoly. It needs to leave the hands of for profit companies and be transitioned to a foundation.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why connect to the Internet with it then. The browser could just make everything up on the fly.

    Got questions about a medication?

    Maybe you want to check up on some disease symptoms?

    AI can make something that sounds vaguely plausible.

    • vane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Why use head if you can use ChatGPT. Remove head and start working smarter.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      Browsing the internet will be like playing AI Quake II, you’ll think you are in this alternate universe.

    • vivendi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I don’t fucking understand why Lemmy is permanently stuck in 2023 with AI

      Using RAG (retrieval augmented generation) results in much lower, almost negligible confabulation rates

        • vivendi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Oh fucking -please-

          This place is genuinely more insufferable than Reddit. That is actually an achievement

          Whatever dude, writhe in your own ignorance

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Mozilla spinning off control of its development to an independent group the way they did with Thunderbird would be the best thing that could happen to Firefox.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Thunderbird :

      Operated by MZLA Technologies Corporation, a subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation, Thunderbird is an independent, community-driven project that is managed and overseen by the Thunderbird Council, which is elected by the Thunderbird community.

      Chrome self-destructing because of stupidity like AI would only ever manage to be a close second, at best.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Firefox, the software mainly driven by Mozilla, which is heavily investing in AI and ads ventures? That Firefox?

      But, maybe “it will be different this time”, I guess.

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    OpenAI is like a zombie stumbling around trying to infect everything. We shove it away because it’s fuckin’ gross and we want nothing to do with it, while the bosses that reanimated it are like “well fuck, we made this thing, we have to use it for something.”

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    How the fuck would this be more cost effective than them making their own chrome based browser and not be a demonstration of their over inflated operating costs and company valuation?

    If you are paying for a service that is charging you enough to allow them to buy the most widly used browser from a company whose business model is to monopolize data, then maybe you’re paying them a titbit more than what the service they’re providing is worth.

    • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m sure they’re less interested about buying Chrome than they are about buying Chrome’s market share

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          The sheer market share that forces websites develop for chrome for maximum visibility, to force websites to allow their content to be scraped to be usable by the average user.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      What allows them to buy chrome is ridiculous investment money, not what they’re charging. From what I read, I think they’re still running a loss because required processing power is still just so insanely ridiculous for AI.