cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/5431344

The enshittification of the internet follows a predictable trajectory: first, platforms are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die. It doesn’t have to be this way. Enshittification occurs when companies gobble each other up in an orgy of mergers and acquisitions, reducing the internet to “five giant websites filled with screenshots of text from the other four” (credit to Tom Eastman!), which lets them endlessly tweak their back-ends to continue to shift value from users and business-customers to themselves. The government gets in on the act by banning tweaking by users - reverse-engineering, scraping, bots and other user-side self-help measures - leaving users helpless before the march of enshittification. We don’t have to accept this! Disenshittifying the internet will require antitrust, limits on corporate tweaking - through privacy laws and other protections - and aggressive self-help measures from alternative app stores to ad blockers and beyond!

  • Armen12@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get the idea, but I also don’t want to go back to the days when BestGore and LiveLeak were around either, you know

    • bioemerl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why? If people want to see stuff, they should be able to see stuff. Who cares if some guy wants to see some random gory video?

    • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I sure agree. Don’t know how your comment managed to become so reviled.

      I appreciate aggressive banning of obviously disgusting material from the communities I’m a part of. That’s why I’m part of them.