“Yeah, they’re gone”: Musk confirms cuts to X’s election integrity team — “‘Election Integrity’ Team… was undermining election integrity,” Musk writes::“‘Election Integrity’ Team… was undermining election integrity,” Musk writes.

  • CeeBee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s a bit of good news. The idea that frogs just wait to get boiled is proven false. Every animal has a limit to what they will tolerate due to self preservation. The from will jump out when it gets too hot.

    That being said, I just recently watched Idiocracy… I’m a bit worried.

    • triclops6@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      You should be worried, in the movie they recognized their stupidity and made way for the smarter character to lead.

      our timeline is worse than idiocracy

    • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just remember that, regardless of the creators’ intents, Idiocracy is essentially pro-eugenics.

      • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s not true at all, genetics only play a part in the mental development of a person, much of it is instead related to the environment where a person has been growing.

        It is as with talent, some people are better than other at certain activities but even the most gifted person cannot compete with a professional who has spent his life training and studying his craft.

        The same can be said for “intelligence”: if you are never taught to think you’ll never think once in your lifetime, even if you are the exact copy of Leonardo da Vinci; on the other hand, even if you are thick as a rock but you’ve been growing in a society focused on your development you’ll be able to become a normal person.

        Eugenetic politics do nothing for humanity betterment, social structure is much more important IMHO

        • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eugenics IMO is just another way to blame poor people for the bad luck of their birth. If we truly wanted to “perfect humanity” there are a million better ways, like free education.

          Just piggy backing off of what you’re saying

          • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolutely. Poverty comes never alone, it usually brings other friends to the party. Like poor education, lack of security, stress, poor nurishment and poor social environment. All this together can easily bring out the worst of people, while the contrary can improve their conditions.

            If you are focused on surviving you’ll never be able to grow as we are all supposed to

            • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Poverty comes never alone, it usually brings other friends to the party. Like poor education, lack of security, stress, poor nourishment and poor social environment.

              This is so true. Even “breaking out of” poverty is hard, if you’re lucky enough to have managed it, because you can’t ever change where you’ve come from. Just anecdotally, my siblings and I have done very well for ourselves financially, but we’ve had to take on a lot of other family members’ debt just to keep them from going under.

              So not only do poor people lack the safety net of family wealth, but they experience a kind of opposite effect if they even do manage to “make it.”

        • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay, I agree with you and I’m not sure why you’re saying I’m wrong. That movie definitely has a eugenics bent and that’s why I’m saying people shouldn’t put too much stock in it.

          • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah it’s in the opening thesis of the movie:

            uneducated people kept having more kids and learned people kept putting it off

            Not saying I agree with the premise at all, and I’m putting it much more lightly than the movie does.

          • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because the movie does not hint at eugenetics as solution to the crisis, it’s a hymn against stupidity and a cry to better educate the masses. First of all about sexual education and the danger of unprotected sex and secondly about politics and civic duties. I mean, I really don’t see how one could interpret the message of the movie as “do eugenetics”, that’s all.

            • Karfkengrumble@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think the people seeing it as pro-eugenics are latching onto the “stupid person makes stupid babies” part as being the reason for the Idiocracy. Basically they think the movie is arguing “IQ is 100% nature and 0% nurture”

              But IMO the intro pretty clearly showed that the main factor in the degradation of society is that the low IQ family were raising too many kids in a chaotic environment with no actual parenting.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It certainly was intended to be satire. Seems that they kind of failed at that over time. We need a new word for when someone makes super cool and blow cereal.

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If that’s the outcome of abstaining from eugenics, I’m willing to give it another shot.