If I know my bad Japanese movies correctly, the radiation is going to mutate that robot until it is 80 feet tall and only Gamera will be able to stop it.

I saw that in my feed and thought, “because it’s a needless pain in the ass most of the time unless it has utility?”

When every man and woman had to wear a hat whenever they went out and those hats did very little to do things like keep them warm or cool (especially women’s hats)… what’s the fucking point?

Ergonomic chairs are also a solution to an often self-inflicted problem. Mainly doing all kinds of things to your body when you’re young that you don’t realize you’ll regret when you’re older.

Are ergonomic chairs a bad thing?

I really don’t think this message is going through. Yesterday, it had all of 1.2k views. I doubt it’s into the millions by now.

Why do I always need to explain to people that Trump needs a lot more than just the MAGA faithful to win? It doesn’t matter what the loyalists think.

Again, I’m not a moderator here and I also never flagged anything you said. Turn down the paranoia about 50 notches.

Also, you initially replied to me. I didn’t tell you to. If you don’t like my “schtick” and talk to me unsolicited anyway, that’s not really my problem.

Exactly what influence do you think me watching it has on anything? You’re giving me far more power than I have. And you are not going to stop me from watching videos that sound interesting to me by trying to shame me out of it. On top of that, the video has 1.2k views. Big fucking deal. Videos with people getting hit in the balls have exponentially more views. He went through the trouble of earning himself a buck fifty.

I am not a mod in this community and you are sealioning. You can argue away literally everything racist Trump has ever said with your “charity” approach. Because he can be this explicit and you still give him the benefit of the doubt. You can be just as charitable and say that the “immigrants are eating dogs” claim isn’t racist. And I wouldn’t be surprised if you do the same sort of sealioning on that one.

Cool. The truth is he said something racist. He’s been informed it was racist and he keeps repeating it.

Stop sealioning.

No it isn’t. The best way to interpret that argument to come to the rational conclusion is to interpret is AS RACIST.

Jesus Christ you are bending over backward to not make an obviously racist comment, which he has since repeated after being called out on the racism, is not racist. He literally did it at the debate. There is nothing irrelevant or counter-productive about saying what is true.

And if you agree that he is a racist, I have no idea why you are being so charitable to the extremely racist thing he keeps repeating.

That would highly depend on the journalist’s audience and their intent in asking the question. Considering he was Venezuelan and representing a Spanish-language outlet, I’m guessing he wanted it on record that Trump was making shit up about Venezuela.

It is good to have these things on record, isn’t it?

Yes? I’m not a journalist.

Nonsense. He’s a racist. He has a very, very long history of racism.

What ad hominems did I make to the OP? Please quote me.

Also, I’m sorry, the “best possible light” interpretation of “she became black” is that it isn’t racist. It’s racist. Not considering it racist is pretty fucking disgusting.

Or “the best result” being that he is the “clear” winner.

it is your duty to interpret statements in the best light possible.

Does that include statements like “they’re eating the dogs in Springfield” and “schools are forcing children to have gender reassignment surgery?”

How about “she became black?”

It seemed like the person I was talking to didn’t. The implication was that tape was viable as long-term storage. It isn’t. I’ve seen tapes rot after a year. DATs were especially prone to that, but even things like 2" multitrack audio tape can go bad that quickly.

My definition of it being “quite clear” that he “won” in this case is that everyone agrees. We do not all agree.

Which journalists in specific pay attention to c/Videos on Lemmy?

So if I change what was literally said, it means something else. Yes, that’s usually the case.

How am I giving anyone headlines? Do you think journalists read what I write?