I am pro socialism and asking what kind of details is missing in pro-socialist arguments that you find capitalists explain well?

How is it a separate discussion?

I am quite cheeky for saying this but:

How is it leaky if the default paradigm of any sequential program is the expectation that it will block? If i write blocking socket code I know my thread is blocked until read() returns.

If i am writing async socket code I know to wait for poll or whatever it is that is the correct way to wait nowadays. My design would reflect that. The blocking is just moved to another thread effectively and this abstraction is packaged as a Future.

Asynchronous code does not require the rest of your code to be asynchronous. I can’t say the same for blocking code.

Well this is just stating a tautology isn’t it?

Edit:

It would be a Hurculean effort, and I don’t think it’s a sustainable approach. If you’re writing a higher level library, it would be a lot to ask to check if your dependency’s dependency’s dependency maybe reads from a socket.

I guess I understand what’s the argument here.

The author wants a safeguard against libraries that are blocking with compiler checks. I agree it is a nice thing to have. But they could have mentioned that without saying “blocking code is leaky abstraction”.

What kind of details can you not fathom in a functioning sustainable system? It shouldn’t be more difficult than “more! MORE AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE!”

Isn’t this not possible considering that the U.S Supreme Court threw out the Chevron Doctrine?

The chickens haven’t come home to roost yet. But by now it’s building up into a tsunami.

This is why giving money to billionaires doesn’t work. Give it to normal working people. They will get some relief and this will increase their morale so the country gets better.

This is on the people for using a discourse space that is not being maintained. I agree only that recent actions by it’s leadership team has be suspect.

Do some websites refuse to function even with useragent spoofing?

No the claim is that the inflation is artificial… not the prices.

You and other trans who are asking people to stop are missing one important point: Harry Potter is the reason many trans people are still alive.

A story can walk farther even if the storyteller faltered sooner.

You have to understand that people often lose their way. It’s in the nature of many humans to do so.

Orangepi, rockchip, Arduino.

There’s nothing novice about wanting to learn.