that’s your interpeetation. what’s missing for me is “must be freely (as in not only by specific entities) obtainable”. with this wording i could just say: “this data is not obtainable” and be done with it.

no it doesn’t. it only says the weights and information about the training data must be open, not the training data itself. which is honestly useless.

BUT IT’S A SINGLE BINARY! UNACCEPTBLE!!! THE BLOAT OF IT ALL!

it was a joke xD i like busybox (and systemd) i don’t particularly subscribe to the unix way, but to each their own ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

“Noooooooo! One tool should do one thing and one thing only! Blasphemy! Heresy! Anthema! Systemd!” crying in unix design philosophy

cackles in firefox…

IT’S NOT CORN! IT’S CALLED A THIRST TRAP I’LL HAVE YOU KNOW, UNEDUCATED PIG!

</ sarcasm> (just to be sure)

do i smell milk on the way to spoiling? hmm granted, i might be wrong but i really don’t think i am.

hoo boy… see this is the problem with machine learning being called AI… we talk in technically minded spaces about what a computer program thinks and nobody stops to think by themselves if this is even a sensible thing to say. which it is just not. ¯_(ツ)_/¯