To shreds you say

It wasn’t a terrible idea, but I’m not surprised that it failed

Chunks, obviously

You need double tides tildes for the cross out text to work

Sounds like this is primarily to punish companies for purchasing fake reviews. I’m a fan

There’s a reason they do it. For every time we hear about it, there are 100 stories that got buried using the same strategy

Finally my time to shine. Looking wayyy back at the history of their evolution, they come from a dinosaur (the ironically named Steadfastasaurus) which has the first ever example of a “pull switch” joint, which allowed them to fake an attack on prey. You might wonder why you would need to fake out an attack, but the answer is as simple as why boxers fake hits today; that is, their prey was a competing predator. They were known to feast on Pregdonalons which had a slow reaction speed evidenced by their diminished prefrontal cortex and amygdala, so the Steadfastasaurus would lurch forward, provoking the Pregdonalon, before immediately counter striking and having a succulent Chinese meal.

It should be noted that I made all this up and have no idea what I’m talking about

Thank you, that was important and I’m glad I was able to view it

Video broken for anyone else?

You mentioned other AI sites, you didn’t call it an AI site. It’s kind of hilarious how many people told you why your comment wasn’t clear, and yet you insist that everyone else is the problem. Lol

Oh, I thought you were talking about the linked news article website. My mistake, I wasn’t about to check out the site that allegedly lets you make CP

The site looks fine to me, I’m not sure where your criticism is coming from.

No shit

Has that been verified?

Yet another “AI bad” post that I can’t replicate. Not that I’m defending Google, they’ve been shit ever since they removed “do no evil” from their strategy, but this is silly. It takes two seconds to verify the top auto generated result when you search something, you literally just have to scroll to the second and third results. If you just take the autogenerated answer (I’m feeling lucky?) without doing any verifying then someone failed you when it comes to doing online research. And for what it’s worth, within hours of this issue being discovered, it was corrected by the same system that made the erroneous claim in the first place.

I’m getting so tired of the pessimists who are against AI. Granted, I can reflect and see my own similar attitude towards Trump: no matter what, I would never vote for him considering his history and who he is as a person. But treating the next generation of technology feels different than that to me; AI is the future, it’s the next revolution. Sure, there are several real issues to criticize and question (copyright, compensation, hallucination come to mind) but instead shit here on Lemmy just gets downvoted to hell with no explanation. I know this comment will get downvoted, but I just wish we could have a discussion about the future without shutting down every practical comment wanting to talk about it.

Like I said, they just hate AI here. It’s pretty amusing

Lol careful posting anything that isn’t negative about AI on Lemmy. They hate AI here

I thought this was already very well known

I very, very seldomly use it. But infighting like you’re advocating for is exactly what giga corporations want us to do. What we SHOULD be doing is demanding better policies from companies, and electing officials who will enforce those demands.

The rich want us to fight each other so we forget it’s us vs them and we vastly outnumber them. Don’t fall for it.