SafetyNet is the name of Google’s tamper protection thingy. Basically, if it’s not a trusted chain, safety net won’t pass.

This doesn’t impact phone functionality, but some apps check for this and refuse to work if it’s not passing. Google Pay is one of the more well-known examples. Some other banking apps will also check for it. Oddly enough, Pokemon Go also used to (not sure if it still does).

Doesn’t that invalidate safety net?

If you install a custom build, doesn’t that break OS verification (or whatever the name of it was)? Meaning things like Google wallet, but more importantly some banking apps, will fail to work?

I see one potential good thing though: maybe people would be less interested in killing the only planet that supports human life if they knew they were going to be on it forever.

I would think suddenly being able to go back to your 20s is the NG+.

Are you sure this would be considered an EULA and not a TOS?

No! Stop! Cease and desist! You’re ruining the lemon economy and now my lemons aren’t worth anything. :(

Are they really in material beach since the agreement you agreed to by giving them money basically says “coins have no value and we can delete them at any time we want”?

I mean, I hate Reddit as much as the next guy here but that sounds a bit like doing a charge back because you didn’t win on the slot machine you just pulled.

Perhaps, but there are a few that do it, such as photoprisim and photostruct.

As somebody that already has an NFS share for their photos, is immich able to use my already existing photo location, or is it another one of those that requires an import process that copies them to its own storage?

So, what, it only lets you upload pics remotely but not view? I do not understand.

I was thinking of trying it out but the huge banner saying not to trust it for anything important makes me hesitate every time.

Not the guy you responded to, but I have experience with the game and stream deck.

The controller works fine, although I can’t help but think some buttons for actions are incorrect. Like cancel on one menu is one button, but a different button elsewhere. I believe controller support was somewhat recently added though so maybe it’s just not fully baked.

I suppose I could contact the author and let them know my feedback.

Not that I disagree with your premise, but the people that want to do it will just create alts.

That’s just a cat and mouse game. IMHO, the admins and developers have better things to do with their life.

There’s been a lot of talk about this, but I’ve yet to see it. It’s either being A/B tested and not fully rolled out, or whatever way they’re detecting adblock isn’t catching me.

There’s plenty of pictures online though of people getting the message.

It’s only scary if you think the AUR is inherently trustworthy. It’s not, and every piece of official documentation and various wikis make it abundantly clear it’s not. (If you see somewhere that doesn’t point it out or edit it so it does.)

The AUR is barely better than pasting J Random Hacker’s ‘curl http://foo | sudo bash’ code you see somewhere to install something. And that’s only because at least the AUR makes it easier to inspect what’s about to run and what changed.