Remember when Apple was demanded to give their cryptographic key to the government to unlock “”“terrorists’ phones”“”

Open Source code for Science/Mathematics/Medicinal related fields 👍

Open Source code for Security/Social Media/Psychological related fields 👎

Legit the cheapo plastic screens on the less than $100 phones are the most resilient phones i’ve ever owned

I had a chunk of metal fall on one, and the only thing it did was INDENT the screen, the plastic was soft enough to bend rather than just crack

https://i.imgur.com/Al6GCMW.png

HAHAHAHAHA

I mean, if you count “active users” of edge, virtually most people are “using” it because it runs on your PC whether you want it to or not.

Argent Energy is extremely clean but it isn’t ethical, COWARD LIBRALS will complain that it’s made from the eternal tortured souls of the dead

Honestly, I’d rather OpenAI lose this one, and NYT lose later on in a much more embarrassing manner that cuts all the golden parachutes

SCO would be better if you got the same type of scanners as the regular registers

Putting everything from the cart onto a belt, and having access to more than 2-4 sets of bags (or a whole carousel at walmart!) without the dumb “did you scan this?” prompt would make me use SCO every single time. Trying to bag groceries in current SCO is miserable, and the sensors are usually so bad that you CANT EVEN REMOVE FULL BAGS when you need to fill another bag

Is this legal harm, moral harm, or whatever they define as harm?

Only thing I can recommend is finding their advertisers and letting them know what they’re advertising on

Honestly depends on location

Where I live, all the towers are Verizon (same signal as Google Fi) and US Cellular, and it’s cheaper than both

what happen when internet go down

radio win every time

A LLM-based system cannot produce results that it hasn’t explicitly been trained on, and even making its best approximation with given data will never give results based on the real thing. That, and most of the crap that LLMs “”“censor”“” are legal self-defense

If ‘censored’ means that underpaid workers in developing countries don’t need to sift through millions of images of gore, violence, etc, then I’m for it

You don’t generally search with YouTube shorts, it presents you with content About 20% is YOUR recommendations (channels you subscribe to) 20% is near-interests (people who do similar content) 20% is whatever is popular at the moment, or whatever a la carte foreign language/low effort content (garena free fire, fortnite) it wants to give you 20% is locational (at home I get anime recommendations due to housemate, at work I get Vegas/Disney vacation or AI garbage) 20% is whatever the algorithm is pushing (channels I have BLOCKED but still appear, tiktok exiles, cooking videos)

Depends entirely on what you’re subscribed to, if you have multiple linked youtube accounts (such as the premium family plan) it depends on what THEY’RE subscribed to, and depends on location (my recommendations at home and my recommendations at work are wildly different)

Making legal precedent so that they AVOID showing the offending content instead of PROMOTING the offending content is probably the goal

About 30-40 times a day, Youtube shorts shows me videos actively advocating violence, and I know for sure that Google has enough money and resources currently to prevent these videos being shown, considering it AUTOMATICALLY SUBTITLES THEM

Making any kind of homemade industrial tool that involves pressure or pneumatics is a surefire way for industrial sized explosions and/or damage

Human experience considers context, experience, and relation to previous works

‘AI’ has the words verbatim in it’s database and will occasionally spit them out verbatim