• 0 Posts
  • 51 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle

  • I’m in the camp of welcoming meta to the fediverse, BUT - not bending over backwards.

    If they start making changes that affect federation for them, then that is their problem. Treat meta as a platform, no different to mastodon.
    Remember that the fediverse consists of more than just Mastodon.
    If meta makes a change and suddenly pixelfed can’t federate properly with meta anymore, it’ll be a shame, but it does not mean that pixelfed should make changes and add workarounds so that it is able to speak to meta again.

    Meta might think they have the power to do this, but they only have that power if we behave like they do.
    If instead we take an attitude of, it’s fine for you to be here, while you are being a good citizen, but if you start making demands - you are on your own.


  • I mean I find it quite ironic really that The fediverse has been screaming about how threads/meta will destroy the fediverse, but in reality - it is the fediverse destroying itself from the inside with this nonsense take.

    And really - who wants to be part of that, it’s actually batshit when you take a step back and think about what is being said:

    “I don’t want anything to do with X and I don’t want anything to do with anyone else who has anything to do with X either”

    OK, right now it’s meta. But let’s talk about lemmy, there are people on the fediverse who think the creators of lemmy are problematic - so what happens when we get “I don’t want to associate with lemmy.world but also I don’t want to associate with anyone else who does associate with lemmy.world”

    Some instances defeded mastodon.social for problematic moderation, but they did not defed other instances that do still federate with mastodon.social.

    It seems like an extreme reaction, and if the fediverse does die, it will be the fediverse itself that implodes rather than being destroyed from any company on the outside.




  • I mean I find it mind boggling that people aren’t noticing yet, that Elon has basically pulled a bait and switch. Especially now that it is becoming even more obvious. Take a product that everyone is using, and degrade the free aspects of it to the point that the only way for people to be able to continue using it - is by paying for it.

    His excuses are ludicrous, that he thinks that advance notice would let “bad actors” change the way they operate, as if those bad actors wouldn’t have just changed the way they operate as soon as it started being limited anyway.

    Hell there is a thread floating around somewhere which shows that you can just reverse engineer the app and get the API key that way. The bots and “bad actors” will therefore continue, and legitimate users will be the only ones impacted.









  • Yeah but Elons problem isn’t just the ASD - that’s part of it sure, but his problem is having ASD and a mother who told him repeatedly from a very very early age, that he was a genius.

    That would be damaging to a neurotypical persons self view, but I dread to think how that damages a neurodivergent 😲

    In short, Elon definitely displays narcissistic tendencies - and I suspect that being constantly told you are a genius who will change the world, is a bug reason why.