Yeah but actual journalism is a cost center

Just generate images and text from the general idea and you are good

Are you a bot or something?

Please answer in ASCII semaphore or French if you don’t know semaphore.

Yup. And then credit it against standard deduction rates so that 🤡s owning multiple unoccupied homes pay real amounts while your grandmother pays pennies

Like a normal tax system, you doink

Zero cashflow retirees are not a thing.

ALL states have property tax.

You don’t know what you are talking about if you don’t understand how taxes are offset and credited. You are just whining about not wanting to participate in society.

Taxes pay for things, go get educated.

Why not

Taxes bad?

Well yeah this is like asking an oboe player how they control pitch, and they respond “different embouchure is the universal way to do it, but adjusting the reed is the best way”

Go look it up if you don’t know what the terms mean

The average user experience has abstracted away understanding how things actually work.

Compounding pharmacies should not be subjected to patents. Then the costs are all local instead of tithes to the corporate clergy.

The moral high ground doesn’t work in war.

You don’t pay… This is a solved problem, wealth gain/loss would work the same way as capital gain/loss

You can use a net capital loss to reduce your taxable capital gain in any of the 3 preceding years or in any future year.

https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/tax/individuals/topics/about-your-tax-return/tax-return/completing-a-tax-return/personal-income/line-12700-capital-gains/capital-losses-deductions/you-use-a-capital-loss.html

It feels like people that don’t like this don’t actually know how to whole system is supposed to work.

They seem to give the average answer, not the correct answer. If you can bound your prompt to the range of the correct answer, great

If you can’t bind the prompt it’s worse than useless, it’s misleading.

https://ycharts.com/companies/AMZN/revenues_annual

For reference

Yes, but how much cashflow did it have, and how much in dividends did the individual stakeholders receive.

It never didn’t pay it’s taxes afaik

Edit: I’m fact checking myself, Amazon’s strategy is reinvesting all profits to support further growth. They were never in a position like the other poster is describing.

If the startup made no profit it would never be worth 1000000. You would only have a capital gain if value was realizable.

If you never made a dime from your initial 100000 investment you would sell off the asset at that point instead of paying taxes.

If you were too dumb to sell parts of your assets, and instead chose to be cash negative or fail to pay your taxes, you kind of deserve to lose everything because you were too stubborn to receive advice from anybody.

People do this exact thing all the time. Taking on debts to keep cashflow or avoid taxes is normal.

If you are just sitting on unproductive assets instead of realising their value in some way, you are doing the wrong thing.

You should be able to gain revenue from the asset or it wouldn’t have appreciating value.

All your comments don’t make sense, it’s like you just want to take from the economy without giving anything back.

Evaluation licence can be used for 6 months and can be extended several times.

Yeah dude. The value of these corporations in inflated or neutral at best. Corporations pop up that are solely created to shelter or exploit to expand wealth.

Nah

Question is, do you know how much the tax revenue is in your area

Is that tax revenue transaction based or wealth based

Would taxing in your paradigm be reasonable or sustainable in the context of the government expenditures in your area?

Yeah dude it’s all a game :/

That doesn’t take into account non federal tax.

https://itep.org/who-pays-taxes-in-america-in-2024/

This says it more explicitly.

using a more realistic definition of income that includes unrealized capital gains, they found that the same 25 Americans paid just 3.4 percent of their income in taxes during that period. If unrealized capital gains were included in these estimates, ITEP, too, would calculate a much lower effective tax rate for the rich