I know what you’re getting at and this isn’t directed at you and I know this is why it’s done, but the capabilities of the phone don’t have any bearing on the use of the AI so why gatekeep it? It’s a dumb way to make a profit.
I know what you’re getting at and this isn’t directed at you and I know this is why it’s done, but the capabilities of the phone don’t have any bearing on the use of the AI so why gatekeep it? It’s a dumb way to make a profit.
This is why I cringe at cell phone manufacturers selling cloud and AI features based on phone models because wtf you’re not running that cloud on that handset so why do you gatekeep the product behind that model? It can’t require that many resources, it’s a cloud app!
But do you pass ant
The king just decided he really isn’t ready for another commitment
I could see something like this being a common use icon, it’s very well done. I prefer this look to having the big bodied Tux on a small icon, this solves the problem well. Good job!
Meanwhile here I am just tooting with folks in my small part of the community blissfully unaware of
Why is Mastodon being treated as a monolithic entity?
becomes nth wife of king suddenly
gonna get weird leaving this battlefield and going home but ok
work 8 times as hard now
gets sacrificed anyway
News sites are freaking stupid.
Sounds nice, wake me up when it’s available
Eh it doesn’t really, there isn’t a surge in radio attacks on cars, it’s just a novel concept so people are feeling spooked
But I’m with you on your first point, security needs to be hardened and the only one who can truly do that is the manufacturer
Another distraction for the big problems not getting solved
What if the disability was just neurodivergent people trying to make a livelihood in their way with their abilities, but doing so in a neurotypical world where neurotypicals make the rules and tell neurodivergents that they cannot participate because they act in ways that are not socially acceptable or require accomodation to adapt to enforced neurotypical norms?
Maybe we seem broken because we don’t behave the same way, and maybe the disability exists because we’re inconvenient to the neurotypicals running the show to accommodate
Maybe the lives are already being ruined due to societal policy and unwritten rules and a treatment won’t resolve the root cause of a problem that isn’t our fault to begin with.
tl;dr, no, you change
deleted by creator
Autism isn’t just a condition, that’s the deal, Autism is a heavily different way of thinking. It shapes Autistic behavior and their viewpoint on life. To them, science has been dedicated to focusing on eradicating a component of their existence, one that a lot of them (definitely not all, there are a lot with your opinion, but I would say a majority) have embraced and wouldn’t want changed. Those Autistics are looking for acceptance, not erasure.
With an anti-Autism treatment available, neurotypical parents will just force it on their Autistic kids, deciding their fate for them, but would also open up an “out” for those who want it, so this isn’t a clear cut good-or-bad thing as one may think.
Yes, I’m sure medical professionals the world over are gauging their assessment criteria on TikTok /s
Lots of animals can. I think they discovered dogs and cats can be in the 60’s or something?
Social media was fun until my family joined and scrutinized my posts, and then I lost all my friends
People have sex in non-self-driving cars, wooptydoo
WHAT IS A man
?! hurl goblet …a miserable pile of secrets…!
I threw this at ChatGPT, it was entertaining.
Q: If you had a chessboard with dimensions comparable to the standard world chess tournament boards, and placed a grain of rice on a square, and then moved to the next square and doubled the amount of rice on that square that you used in the previous one, and kept doing this pattern of picking a square and placing twice as many grains as you did on the last one, approximately how many squares could you fill before the rice starts to overflow into other spaces?
A: Let’s analyze the problem step-by-step to determine how many squares can be filled before the rice starts to overflow.
Understanding the problem: You start with 1 grain of rice on the first square of a chessboard. On each subsequent square, you double the number of grains of rice from the previous square. This means the number of grains on the ( n )-th square is ( 2^{n-1} ).
Capacity and overflow: We need to find the point at which the total amount of rice becomes excessively large, potentially exceeding the board’s capacity. This problem is fundamentally a geometric progression and exponential growth problem.
Chessboard specifics: A standard chessboard has 64 squares.
Exponential growth: Let’s calculate the number of grains of rice on a few key squares to understand the rapid growth:
Total grains on the board: The total number of grains of rice after filling all 64 squares is the sum of the geometric series: [ S = 2^0 + 2^1 + 2^2 + \ldots + 2^{63} ] The sum of this series can be calculated as: [ S = 2^{64} - 1 ] This is a massive number: [ 2^{64} - 1 \approx 18.45 \times 10^{18} \text{ grains} ]
Practical limitations: In reality, the amount of rice that can fit on a square or even within the confines of a board or room will quickly become unrealistic after a relatively small number of squares. For example:
Given the calculations above, the exact square where the rice starts to overflow would depend heavily on the physical capacity of the square, which we’ve assumed to be quite large in this hypothetical.
Therefore, if we were to realistically consider overflow within a standard physical context, you might see overflow happening anywhere from the 20th to 30th squares, given the doubling nature of the sequence.