4o is optimization of the model evaluation phase. The loss of intelligence is due to the addition of more and more safeguards and constraints by the use of adjunct models doing fine turning, or just rules that limit whole classes of responses.

Just send it mate

ironically half my team at work is in Norway and they use windows. My team in the US uses linux.

Yes, very insightful.

Its like saying we just need good kings, no ids a bad system. Any capitalist system will devolve in corruption and monopoly. No regulations can survive the unavailable regulatory capture and corruption.

if the question is which os has the most distinct running copies then yeah its linux.

Tell me you don’t understand what it is by telling me you don’t understand what Crowdstrike does.

You do realize that linux is something like 80% of servers. Which also well out number personal machines. If you include android linux is easily the most used os on the planet.

It’s short but to the point, use AGPL and the problem is capitalism.

Well that is disappointing.

It’s highlighting a potential significant risk. Major ozone loss is much worse than lack of internet. The high uncertainty of the paper is easily offset by the harm that would be caused if the paper is correct.

Doing scientific experiments to understand the risks is worth doing.

Authentication of the author is not the same as copyright.

Using it to generate things that you double check. Transforming generative work to review work is a boost in productivity. So writing of any kind, art, etc. asking the llm for facts without context is a gross mistake. Prompting it to generate a specific paragraph in a larger, technical or regulator document is useful.

Bc if you had meme dreams they would be nightmares?

The world is a much worse place with bad search. We need a search system that is treated like a utility and paid based on success not ad views.

It’s not as if Google’s results have improved in that time span. They are significantly worse now.

I really enjoy gnome, I much prefer it.

The comment above ignored the article and is just talking how digital media can be revoked.

That wasn’t the point being made.