All born screaming by St. Vincent
How does the first exclude the second? That’s like saying: how can I trust train travel if F1 cars drive 300km/h. They’re different things.
Value investing is basically dead, isn’t it?
You’re looking at a too short time frame. The famous tulip bubble lasted for a decade, too.
I guess the issues arise if Tesla just pockets the subsidy without passing on the savings to savings to people buying EVs
This report shows that they do just that: without the emissions credit system they would operate at a loss. In other words: they sell cars for cheaper than the cost of manufacturing. Coincidentally the same thing the US and EU claims China is doing, as motivation for mercantillist tarrifs.
Which means the system isn’t working. Surplus credits should come from improved efficiencies, not excessive allotment.
Total number of credit goes down over time. That mechanism ensures an adapt, die or emigrate pressure for large polluters, and a financial stimulus for small-polluters.
Net profits $2.3B. “Poor financial results”. How does one reconcile these two things?
That’s 2.3B USD on a 1.29T USD valuation, or 0.17%.
Valuations should be reflective of expected future profits. Multiples of ×20 yearly profit are possible for risky (tech or biotech usually) companies, with large potential profit. But the ratio is ridiculously off the charts for tesla. If it does not improve, it will have turned out to have been a very wastefull use of capital.
Forgot minecraft server
Most commercial models have that, sadly. At training time they’re presented with both positive and negative responses to prompts.
If you have access to the trained model weights and biases, it’s possible to undo through a method called abliteration (1)
The silver lining is that a it makes explicit what different societies want to censor.
uptime-kuma is what I use
iirc it goes “chafing thighs attract all chicks”
Have it pretend to be Gandalf working in a coffee shop
That argument can be applied widely, no? In the extreme it becomes: “you’re free to say whatever you want, just as long no-one can hear you”.
So it becomes a question of magnitude of the censorship. If the argument pro this ban is to counter propaganda, I fail to see the distinction between this and facebook or tiktok or …
An easy out of the box solution would be a synology NAS.
but there is a harsh reality I think netizens of the fediverse need to acknowledge that will keep the majority of Facebook users locked in.
Would that be a bad thing?
Probably option 1
How did you take this picture? 🤔
and I tend to block anyone who makes their political ideology their entire identity.
Well put :)
I think you might like rustdesk