I believe it involves impossible math, like dividing by 0

Fuck protecting American interests.

We need to be protecting HUMAN interests. Not billionaires desires for more zeros at the end of their net worth.

And then when they do get checked out, the punishment is only a tiny fraction of the profits they stole.

Ok. Found some DNS settings on my router, and fixed the internal domain name “problem” but it’s still only internal. If I set my public IP(internally) it doesn’t connect.

I can connect to an internal computer from external, even though the client says “not ready”.

I cannot connect from internal to external computer. Instantly shows “remote desktop is offline”

This leads me to think that somehow I have something wrong in router settings, or I have a security feature blocking something. I just don’t know enough about routing to know where to look.

I got past the key mismatch internally. Maybe it was blank spaces.idk.

But still having issues externally. Just doesn’t connect for some reason, though I’ve confirmed all the ports are open. :/

It seems I may have “fixed”(?) One problem, as internal network connections succeed now (same key, same settings, just restarted the containers a few times and let it sit?)

External connections still show the same. :/

Irl the king would totally try and kill the pawn to survive.

And if the pawn overpowered the king then it’s possible the pawn, or one of the bishops would become the new king.

Of course a company would say that they don’t want a monopoly publicly. If it’s known they are, or want a monopoly, then they are more likely to fall in public favor and get hit with fines and legal action, hurting shareholder profits.

You have a lot of faith that capitalism won’t do a capitalism when the opportunity presents itself.

Yes Europe has a lot better hold against the evils of capitalism, but it’s still capitalistic.

Nah. The C suite would love it if they were the only game in town. Shareholder profits and stock goes through the roof. They don’t have competition so they don’t have to innovate or improve anything but profits. They get a HUGE bump in net worth and “retire” while still collecting their board approved stock options.

Yes the company would eventually kill a ton of people and might be shut down like Boeing, but “I got mine, fuck you”.

Yup. No reason to rewrite the playbook.

“Full self driving” detects an imminent collision of it’s own doing. Car beeps and shuts off “full self driving”

Human was “in control” at the time of the crash, not our fault.

Not even.

Ford’s fix required them to physically add parts.

This is more like if Ford just wrote a software update to detect the crack and leak, then pop up a warning that you need to pull over and “secure” the fuel.

And the 8" were probably the cheapest.

So, as always in government, you get the minimum that satisfies the contract.

Depends what the definition of “best” is.

In capitalism “best” is the most profit for the least time and effort.

Let’s be honest here: they hate that the companies are jerking them around and using bullshit programs to cause even more problems, instead of employing people to solve the problems.

But a child process is already a child, not an unborn fetus. So they don’t care.

Second note, the metal pipe has to be continuously metal from at minimum where it enters the house, don’t trust that if you see a metal water pipe (or drain pipe) that it’s grounded.

Definitely realistic, just not as profitable for rich billionaires.

Yeah, make them out of metal, that rolls on metal roads. And those metal tires can carry a ton more weight, so put a lot of people in them who are going the same way.

Oh right, we already have those.

Home assistant, and frigate. Along with whatever type of smart lock you choose (even building one with esphome, diy version)

Shittycon valley vs Shittycon slopes. Might as well be the same thing.