That doesn’t apply to all engineering. In ChE, it’ll literally blow up later…

The issue with engineering is that if you don’t solve it efficiently and correctly enough, it’ll blow up later.

Smart. I’ve seen it on manufacturing lines for operators logging into SAP. They put the barcode on the back of their badge.

Unfortunately the Reverb G2 will be junk when WMR is removed from Windows.

I don’t use one, only the official carrying case when it is not being used. I don’t see the point as I’m not using it while walking or moving.

A 3.75% of the cars total value as a “document fee” is the same as a 3.75% sales tax. The only difference is that you also pay it when you bring in a car from out of state.

Cars are taxed in Delaware.

Bezos isn’t even involved in Amazon anymore.

The stainless in the cyber truck is 301, which is less corrosion resistant than 304 or 316. You can read all about stainless corrosion in Appendix A.

Stainless steel still rusts when exposed to salt and water.

There are only a few manufacturers of robotic arms, and have this feature as it is required by law in many countries. This was a new installation and I’ll be happy to bet all sorts of money that it had it installed and wasn’t used.

There are many ways to do this safely. All robotic arms come with a disable key that powers off the axis motors, latches all the brakes, but leaves the sensors and end of arm tooling powered up to troubleshoot. Troubleshooting can also be done via PC and watching inputs/ outputs on the program.

You are likely very correct. These robots are dumb. They do the same repetitive task over and over to a high degree of precision. Flag a photo eye and it’ll start the sequence to pick up a box.

This is either a lock out issue or a design issue and it is irrelevant that it was a robot.

He isn’t responsible for PayPal. His company, X.com, merged with PayPal and he was ousted after a short period of time. PayPal already existed before he was involved.

The exploit works on any browser on an iPhone or iPad…

I suppose it has nothing to do with alienating your core demographic.

Space X was also very slow in getting the required report to the agency to review. Perhaps Space X should have done a better job there instead of rushing ahead to the next launch.

They static fired at half the thrust available again. There were no issues when they did that last time as well.

What you said is correct except that they went into it ignoring the lessons of the past. NASA had done tons of testing and knew that the launch pad wouldn’t survive half the Starship’s thrust and designed a launch pad that worked. Space X instead chose to believe that a special concrete would be enough. The new launch pad is missing a flame diverter and will likely be the failure of the next vehicle. The iterative approach doesn’t work if you can’t get a launch clearance from the FAA due to a lack of trust.

This is likely why .world initiated some changes over the last week.