were they able to do some work on emulation already?

I’m not very familiar with those services but are they not relying on YouTube, and therefore still YouTube in a way?

edit before anyone argues, I know these alternative frontends bring many privacy advantages and many usability advantages (and disadvantages). But the content still comes from YouTube which is what my argument is about. I wouldn’t say an alternative frontend (or client for that matter) is not using YouTube…

my comment wasn’t referencing any character or profile called content king as I don’t know about them. It’s more so referring to the fact that most people will go to where the most content is. There is no point in using other services if you aren’t finding what you are looking for…

that’s where the content is and content is king