The way you word it suggests that donations to Mozilla are expressly forbidden from being spent on Firefox. Which I doubt is true.

But yes, many would prefer to donate specifically for Firefox development than into a general pool for Mozilla to allocate as they choose.

Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.

They’re kinda addressable in that the electron beam scans across a line, and every through each line, with a pulse activating the (iirc phosphor) at the pixel for the desired colour.

I think the alternative: copyright should be looser. It usually only benefits corporations and lawyers.

Though it would be naive to consider AI companies and ally in a goal to reduce copyright terms.

If it wasn’t for StarOffice/OpenOffice/LibreOffice Impress, is have thought a rename to Impress would be a good name.

I read this a few weeks ago about it.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

But to where would they expel the Jews if they did not have some level of support for Zionism and allow Israel to exist?

Always been a fan of it being Hal Finney, regardless of any evidence. It’s poetic symmetry with losing both around the same time.

Local companies may have similar names to others that exist overseas.

To require them to be in a globally common non-regionalised pool of domain names is more likely to increase scam risks.

Should the various regional companies of the Vodafone brand be forced to have all their world wide customers sign in to a global parent organisation Vodafone.com? Is it not better for the regionally specific customer portal be vodafone.com.au and vodafone.co.uk?

How does the use of ccTLDs furthers harms against the countries?

Ten years ago sure, the days I’d suggest matrix instead.

It’s an abundant resource curse; land is the resource that is wasted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse

Were they real or just shit novelty, scams, or rebadges and sister brands of those multi brand companies like BBK?

Is that a picture of a straw man?

Not to mention that material science has improved a hell of a lot since Hindenburg.

Why?

Rh-null. So rare they can almost never receive a transfusion.

Calling it verified is the only problem for a paid service. Name it Premium, +, anything else that implies a value added experience. But pay for verification is stupid.

The ~ has an error of +/- 50 percentage points.

What new personal information did meta get from Instagram users enabling threads?