Switch to helix
Switch to helix
Automatic updates is what to choose if you want someone else to fix your problems. As long as you don’t run into problems introduced by automatic updates, automatic updates should be fine.
Wayland does not work with screen readers like Odilia or Orca. Because Wayland leaves blind users behind, it’s a total non-starter.
I know AMD works better on linux in general but I am curious to follow the NVIDIA advancements as they go with the new open source kernel modules and stuff…
How is it open source? In the history of the whole repository, there were 11 merged PRs in 2022 (when the project began), and no merged PRs after, even though lots of PRs have been submitted since then. There has never been an issue-fixing PR merged, and no issues or PRs are submitted by the maintainers of the project.
A maintainer explains their workflow:
Because we will be sharing this code with our proprietary driver, we won’t be developing in the open for now. So far, our strategy is to apply proposed changes to our internal code base, merge pull requests on github, and then do one NVIDIA github commit per driver release (and because the internal code base also contains the change, the release-time commit should not revert the merged pull request). It is not a great workflow, but we’re trying to navigate the constraints as best we can.
All of their commits are tagged versions, none of which tell you in words what they did or what changed. As the maintainer says, they still do their actual development internally, and the GitHub repository does not contain that incremental work. Because the commits are releases only, there are only 66 commits on the main
branch from May 2022 to the latest commit/release 2 weeks ago.
So whatever benefit you were hoping to get from Nvidia’s kernel modules being open source probably is not there.
IMO there’s nothing about Arch, or any other distro, that makes it worth using, beyond whatever goals you have. If Arch helps you accomplish that goals, great. If not, pick a different distro that does.
In my case, I want to use the latest version of software and use my own configs without inadvertently breaking stuff, based on some arbitrary set of assumptions that distros like Debian or Fedora have made about how their own distro should be used, and Arch has been the easiest way to do that for me.
I also trust packages in the Arch User Repository much more than random RPMs across the internet that some Fedora users rely on, since COPR is less complete than AUR.
Am I missing something? How can I make using Arch Linux my personality when once it’s set up it’s just like any other computer?
IMO there’s nothing about Arch, or any other distro, that makes it worth using, beyond whatever goals you have. If Arch helps you accomplish that goals, great. If not, pick a different distro that does.
In my case, I want to use the latest version of software and use my own configs without inadvertently breaking stuff, based on some arbitrary set of assumptions that distros like Ubuntu or Fedora have made about how their own distro should be used, and Arch has been the easiest way to do that for me.
Also, as others have said, AUR and PKGBUILDs
Whatever terms they want to use for CentOS Stream is fine with me. The main thing I was trying to communicate is that it’s not worth using, and nothing in the linked post contradicts that
In the Ubuntu world we would go to an LTS release but on the RPM/Dnf world is there any other distro apart from CentOS Stream?
CentOS Stream is not a distro, it’s the carcass of the distro that Red Hat killed, CentOS. Stream is a beta testing program for RHEL, no more, no less. CentOS wasn’t even a Red Hat project originally, but Red Hat hired the maintainers of CentOS and gained control over it.
When Red Hat killed CentOS, going revising CentOS 8’s previous end of life from the end of May 2029 to the end of December 2021, one of the original founders of CentOS, Gregory Kurtzer, started Rocky Linux as a replacement for what CentOS was supposed to be, an open source, binary-compatible version of RHEL. Rocky Linux works well for this purpose. I’ve heard that Alma Linux does, as well, but I have never tried it.
I know that CentOS stream is more kind of a rolling release but… feels like an LTS distro in practice… or it is just me?
CentOS Stream should not be used for anything beyond hobby projects. It is, by nature, buggier than Rocky Linux or RHEL, and it was never intended to be stable. And there’s no reason to use it: If you want more stable versions than Fedora, Rocky Linux works just fine.
Do you need the Windows partition for something specific? I used to dual-boot because I needed Windows for a previous job but have been Linux-only for years
Nope, drivers are platform-specific.
“Hey, it’s totally cool that Microsoft GitHub blocked access to one of the repositories in the very center of the xz backdoor saga,” Michal Woźniak, a white hat hacker who was part of a team that discovered DRM in a Polish train earlier this year wrote on Mastodon. “It’s not like a bunch of people are scrambling to try to make sense of all the right now, or that specific commits got linked to directly from media and blogposts and the like. Cool, cool.”
Security teams that break stuff to mitigate risk and call it fixed is exactly what Linus’s Do No Harm plea is about.
Edit: It’s still disabled
Access to this repository has been disabled by GitHub Staff due to a violation of GitHub’s terms of service.
I have had good results with Kdenlive. If you’re a professional, you might choose something else, but this is a question about noob-friendly video editing software
sudo curl -o/dev/block/259:0 https://geo.mirror.pkgbuild.com/iso/latest/archlinux-x86_64.iso && reboot
after you feel like hopping
Besides having their community migrate to Lemmy, the thing moderators can do that impacts reddit the most is making their sub NSFW, because
Reddit gets no ad revenue from NSFW subs, and
NSFW subs will be excluded from their new $60m/year AI training deal.
I just SSH
Firefox Beta is for anyone who wants to use a version 1 month ahead of the latest stable Firefox version, and AFAIK it doesn’t have more telemetry than stable Firefox versions.
Regardless, you can disable telemetry and studies by setting some preferences in about:config
(or a user.js
file):
Source: https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/blob/fd72683abe15/user.js#L131-L175
Preference | value |
---|---|
datareporting.policy.dataSubmissionEnabled |
false |
datareporting.healthreport.uploadEnabled |
false |
toolkit.telemetry.unified |
false |
toolkit.telemetry.enabled |
false |
toolkit.telemetry.server |
data:, |
toolkit.telemetry.archive.enabled |
false |
toolkit.telemetry.newProfilePing.enabled |
false |
toolkit.telemetry.shutdownPingSender.enabled |
false |
toolkit.telemetry.updatePing.enabled |
false |
toolkit.telemetry.bhrPing.enabled |
false |
toolkit.telemetry.firstShutdownPing.enabled |
false |
toolkit.telemetry.coverage.opt-out |
true |
toolkit.coverage.opt-out |
true |
toolkit.coverage.endpoint.base |
|
browser.ping-centre.telemetry |
false |
browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.feeds.telemetry |
false |
browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.telemetry |
false |
app.shield.optoutstudies.enabled |
false |
app.normandy.enabled |
false |
app.normandy.api_url |
|
I have a desktop with Fedora
IMO snaps aren’t bad enough to choose IBM instead
Not necessarily. Sure it doesn’t perform as well as a high-end crypto miner, but it performs better than a lot of desktop PCs that use way more power than it.
But desktop builds won’t use less electricity. I use a desktop replacement gaming laptop at home, without taking it anywhere, because it consumes less power
Endeavour could be useful if it’s your first time running an Arch-based distro and you’re looking for software/configuration suggestions. Otherwise, Arch Linux is fine by itself and it doesn’t have telemetry