• 70 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle
































  • Genres are not bullshit. They give you an instant general idea what kind of work something is. If you wanted to hear either someone’s best classical recording of the year or best metal recording of the year, that simple addition of genre already tells you which one you’re likely more interested in.

    To be clear, I am not in favour of discussions arguing what narrowly specific micro genre a piece of music belongs to. I’m only suggesting a single word is added as a guide. That’s all.





  • The company told subscribers the rise was to “invest in and innovate our product offerings and features, and bring you the best experience”, but tactically avoided mentioning any positive effects for recording artists and songwriters. Their share of streaming income is not determined by Spotify itself – it is also affected by the terms of their record deal, should they have one. Spotify was, however, among services opposing an increase in the royalty rate for songwriters in the US (that opposition failed in July 2022 and the new rate was set at 15.1%).

    Doesn’t look like it to me, other than what they’re obliged to do by the new rate set last year.



  • This is a clickbait headline. I think we should try to avoid these here. At the very least give the main points of the article to avoid giving unnecessary traffic to potentially meaningless articles.

    For everyone’s benefit, and for the help of discussion (which is what we want here) here are the main six points from the article:

    Let’s look at everything Mastodon gets wrong.

    1) Terrible name

    Mastodon implies large, slow, frozen, and dead for thousands of years. The logo is cute, but the service right now stinks almost as badly as a thawing woolly mammoth.

    2) There is no single Mastodon

    In trying to satisfy a spike of new users, Mastodon broke the cardinal rule of social media: it separated them into silos and made it hard if not impossible for them to all socialize. This unfortunate design makes Mastodon feel more like a bunch of chat rooms rather than a cohesive, growing social network. The Federated Timeline helps, but it’s not the default view.

    And I get that having a decentralized social media platform, Mastodon creator Eugen Rochko’s big idea, helps create safe zones from groups and topics, but it’s really a terrible approach that will lead to a stagnant growth and way more opinion bubbles, which is the last thing we need.

    3) Toots

    In trying to be the anti-twitter, Mastodon’s Rochko chose the dumbest and most ridiculous post name possible: Toots. This too-cute take-off on Tweets literally hurts me every time I say and do it on Mastodon.

    4) Handles are meaningless

    User handles do show up in Toots (blech!) but not in the URLs for users’ Mastodon homepages. Giving users numbers (mine is 995) instead of identifiable website addresses makes Mastodon feel amateurish.

    5) Where is everyone?

    If you can’t find people by name, then how can you follow them on Mastodon? Someone in one local Mastodon timeline may not appear in another (Sorry, Mr. Shatner). To see everyone (at least I think you see everyone), you have to troll the Federated timeline, open a Toot (blech!) and add them there. Twitter and other social networks already have this stuff figured out. Why is Mastodon better? It’s not!

    6) Apps feel like a science project

    I started using Mastodon in Safari. It was not a good experience. At least there’s an app…or apps.

    There is no one app called Mastodon. Instead, you can find a Github list of apps for the open-source project. Apps like the iOS-based Amaroq let you log into any of the many Mastodon “instances” by typing in the name. Nope, there’s no list of instances because I don’t think anyone knows just how many Mastodon instances are out there.