@realcaseyrollins

I mean, there’s a lot of motivation to not do anything with twitter but stay away from it

@realcaseyrollins

No doubt they’ll kill it off as soon as it sees any sort of adoption

Yes I am also @KI5SMN :D

@wave_walnut

This is brilliant. You’re promoting something here to which you didn’t provide a (very visible?) link. I can’t find one, anyway. I guess I’ll just use my imagination and context to think about what OP might have been posting about.

The main reason M$ stopped doing it is it did not work as intended in the long term. If anything, it hurt them in the long term. Hence c#. Hence their awkward embrasure of linux.

I’m sure my fellow commentors have made good work of answering this question, but I wanted to offer my perspective as well.

The big thing to understand is, perception of a thing is about focus and direction. If you consider the communities to be consumers of content delivered according to a protocol, That protocol affords subscription services, and means of posting. Much of the rest of it is just security (where do you log in and post from?) and consumption format - all these services have enough in common that the content can be moved around among them without too much hassle about the storage and communications format, and the display format is 90% of the difference between e.g., kbin and mastodon.

As it turns out, the walled garden people had to work hard to make those gardens walled, and to keep them that way. The evolution of communications systems favors this kind of unrestricted exchange of information and bespoke methods of presentation for consumption.

Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on your perspective, these new communications methodologies do not readily lend themselves to converting private persons and their self expression into corporate mass market products.