I love when FCC at least appears to do something, not like under Shit Pai.
Frankly though they should revise Title II classification for the Internet and remove exception from the requirement to share last mile to competitors. This is the main reason there’s almost no competition. It doesn’t make sense for every single ISP to run lines to every home. Those lines should be leaseable.
They could always remove those complex fees and make the bill simpler…
It is privacy. I don’t have mess, just don’t feel like sharing inside of my house with strangers. Maybe I’m working in weird company, but I noticed that vast majority of coworkers either have camera off, blurs the background or sets up a fake one.
I’m guessing you don’t work in corporate environment or no longer work from home.
There are times when video is expected to be on, but you don’t want to show your room to everyone.
Having said that I can’t think of firefox being able to stream video yet not being able to do this, so likely it is Google’s way to make its competitor look subpar. Probably can be fixed by spoofing user agent. Ironically the most recent change in Chrome will make this very difficult in the future.
Did you try agent spoofing (which probably won’t work in the future because of this). This sounds like things Microsoft (and now Google) does to make their product look better.
If you want to have choice in the future you should go with Firefox. Google is close to (or maybe already did) make Chrome equivalent of the Internet Explorer.
The better thing to what was with IE is that majority of websites still work fine in Firefox and people who stick to Chrome just do due to mostly ignorance.
They said in the video, that it isn’t easy to decarbonize maritime industry. So I think it stayed like that because burning hydrocarbons is easiest.
Looking at logs on those wings, I noticed EU logo there. So it looks like they are trying this because they got government money for this project and likely if not for that this work likely wouldn’t happen.
With ISP what is really need is Local-loop unbundling but extending to ISPs.
Those that are old enough to use DSL in early 2000, might remember there was a lot of ISPs to chose from. The reason for it was that due to Title II telco companies were required to lease lines to their competitors. When cable started to be popular, ISPs lobbied politicians to categorize it under Title I which removed that requirement. We got Internet back to be categorized as Title II, but this specific rule was excluded and this is what is necessary to bring the competition.
If it is too hard, I’ll be ok if they just skip it and won’t charge it.
So who is using it? Where are tools which allow you to set up and manage the infrastructure? Why it can’t be disabled, except hacks, and one undocumented feature requested by NSA, because they did not want it running? It is a backdoor, if it wasn’t it would be disabled by default and you would have to pay premium to have that feature enabled.
Intel Management Engine is a component that has access to your computer on a level that even you, the computer owner, don’t have access to. It can be operated remotely, even when your computer is off.
And traditionally you can’t even disable it (remember, you’re not the trusted party in that mix).
I don’t really use any tool. For my stuff I use FastAPI which generates swagger UI, and when troubleshooting I interact that way.
Ousted means, the board of directors removed him from CEO position against his wishes (in case of Zip2), and in case of X.com they did it while he was on honeymoon. Both of this things happened BEFORE the companies became successful.
You haven’t mentioned any companies that I didn’t already mention.
SolarCity, The Boring Company, X.com (basically his X.com that he is trying to revive with Twitter died when they merged with Confinity and created PayPal, and likely it’s why he was ousted), I guess technically Neuralink has still chance to succeed.
Yeah, Zip2 was founded in 1995, he was ousted from it in 1996, the company sold in 1999.
He founded X.com in 1999, was ousted in 2000 before it became PayPal and sold to eBay in 2002
SpaceX was company that he actually founded and got successful, Tesla he technically didn’t found but as you mentioned bought majority share and made himself look like CEO.
SpaceX and Tesla though are really run by different people SpaceX, they just learned how to deal with him instead of ousting it as the other companies did. But ok, I think he still deserves credit.
Though you omitted all the companies that he failed at. If you have a lot of money you can afford to lose frequently and still be successful. A luxury that you or me don’t have.
Actually he had many companies that failed or he was ousted of before they were successful. SpaceX is one that he actually started, even Tesla wasn’t founded by him. It really helped to have money to invest.
He is definitively a risk taker. The thing with a risk is that is easy to take if you have money, and if you have a lot of money you can fail many times.
He was born to rich family and had that luxury.
Here’s summery of his evandors:
1995 - Founded Zip2 with his brother, got ousted from CEO position in 1996, the company was sold to Compaq in 1999
1999 - he launched his X.com with three founders
2000 - X.com merged with Confinity resulting in PayPal, Musk again was ousted as a CEO on the same year, in 2002 they sold it to eBay (he no longer was in the company but still had stocks)
2002 - He used his money from PayPal to fund SpaceX
2004 - Tesla. This one is interesting, because he is recognized by a lot of people as founder, but he was investor, but they let him to paint himself as Founder
2006 - SolarCity - it didn’t do well and was purchased by Tesla in 2016
2015 - co-funded OpenAI, he resigned in 2018 due to conflicts with Tesla AI
2016 - co-funded Neuralink
2016 - The Boring Company - supposed to be working on creating hyperloop, but that idea turned out to be failure, and now any mention of hyperloop was scraped from the company website. He apparently admitted that hyperloop was successful attack to stop California from building high speed rail.
2022 - Twitter
So it looks like largely his biggest successes were Zip2, X.com/PayPal and SpaceX and investment in Tesla. In Zip2 and X.com he was ousted before companies got successful.
SpaceX and Tesla are where he actually succeeded the rest after that he was just throwing money in investments. Technically that’s also what happened with Tesla.
It is notoriously hard to replicate things in labs, especially with material science.
This was attempt to do it within 2 days of the paper being published.
To add to that, the original researchers apparently had 10% successes rate in their lab, they wanted to perfect it before publishing their paper.
Bad luck was that it leaked, so to make sure somebody else doesn’t get credit for their work they published what they had within hours.
It likely will take months before this will be verified.
All of that can be easily checked via JavaScript, but now if you world use extensions to disable those checks you would not pass the attestation.
So yeah, essentially you no longer have control over your computer, and need to bend over and accept everything the site owner wishes to do.
Does blocking ads by DNS still work? Current ads are AFAIK more sophisticated
That’s how it supposed to be done.
I’m jealous.