🎶 They look like robots but are actually just guys 🎶
🎶 They look like robots but are actually just guys 🎶
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
This is the book they’re talking about:
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/727417/the-trading-game-by-gary-stevenson/
I believe he’s played by Rowan Atkinson
Aren’t you allowed to provide a doctor’s note that does not specify the ailment?
Is it though? Surely it can be made less obtrusive
I dont care for the lengthy skill checks with the dice roll animation
Original article:
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl2688
Wouldn’t a vpn solve this?
I would’ve loved to have seen it win. I do think Nemo had a well deserved win though.
To me, the most surprisingly underperforming song was the one by Estonia. Such a banger!
This one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui_u0M7_hjs
In a nutshell
Qualcomm: better support for amd, no support for linux
Intel: support for linux
Other than that it is too early to tell because drivers continue to be developed and it’s still early days for wifi 7
Gutted
Lol let’s stop people from using this open source design
If anything this might increase self-reliance
GTK is mainly developed by Gnome
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTK
This path is disgusting
Gonna check it out. Is it foss? Didn’t find it on fdroid
Ahh, not available for android
Yeah just like the ipod and iphone. Oh wait
I don’t think this is gong to be a success. I feel like the tech is a solution without a problem.
I think the only sensible application is niche, enthusiast gaming, and valve is already pretty established there.
We’ll see though. Apple will probably have thought about this and identified usecases and developed software for their vr platform
“When we step back and look at it, we see that it is a de facto open ecosystem. Open ecosystems benefit from having consortiums with stakeholders, all with a voice in driving the ecosystem forward”
Lol if the x86 ISA is an open ecosystem, CocaCola is an open source beverage.
Trying to read between the lines though, is Norrod implying that they are considering moving toward a more open x86?
The impression I’m getting is that they’re thinking about sacrificing various legacy features (32bit being the most obvs one) to bring performance per Watt closer to the competition. And then put in its place a more standardized successor? RIS86? They will likely aim to steer clear of formal (published) standards because they want their trade secrets. However, they will need to simultaneously ensure not to violate antitrust rules.
Might be easier for them to just forfeit trade secrets and embrace a different model altogether.