• maniii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    And what fill up important shipping and harbours with WindFarms ? They have almost no land and actively are dredging and building up out on the sea as it is.

    If they expand too much they will either lose shipping lanes or docking locations for container ships.

    You can’t mess with the local wildlife and ecology. There is a limit to anything and everything that Singapore can do on their already over-built tiny island.

    • atro_city@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, that’s why they could try and get wind farms along the coast of the myriads island around them. They are already proving that they are OK with getting energy from long distances, why not from the Philippines, Borneo, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, etc. They are much closer.

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Do you understand how corruption works in SouthEast Asia? Do you understand the threat of China simply “stealing” / “destroying” other countries infrastructure? Imagine if China could cripple Singapore by cutting undersea cables etc, what would happen to WindFarms that are on the ocean surface.

        Singapore PHYSICALLY CANNOT run WindFarms of the size and scale you are talking about. Not on their own territories and definitively not in other surrounding countries territories. Singapore depends on Water from Malaysia already( even then Singapore is installing Desalination plants in attempts to reduce the dependencies as we speak ) And If Singapore decides to depend so much on their neighbours, there is a real and imminent threat of corruption/sabotage/malfeasance/crimes that can seriously affect Singapore.

        • atro_city@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          So instead of diversifying the risk and having multiple partners they’re going to have one single long cable that can be cut? I don’t think that makes more sense.