HP wants you to print things through its cloud service, wherein you pay a subscription fee for ink and your usage is routed through its servers. To encourage you to do this, it covers the USB port …

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure they’ll get to it. Trouble is there’s so many bullshit moves that companies engage in and it takes time to ban all of them.

      I think the EU should ban apple devices. They claim to be pro privacy but what they really are is pro not giving everyone else your data but keeping it themselves, that’s not privacy, that’s false advertising.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That bothers me less though.

        Apple “Ok yeah we’re gonna keep your data and mine it. But just us” is a whole lot better than “Lol, your shits for sale” which is Google.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How is it better? It’s still data mining.

          People love to love apple but they’re just a company they don’t care about you.

          I don’t understand why they get special privileges, I don’t understand why people vehemently argue in their favor of them when they’re clearly just as bad as Google. They’re just better at making you think otherwise.

          • nikt@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because Apple’s core business is selling their stuff to you. Google’s core business is selling you to other companies.

            Google’s consumer software and products literally serve no other business purpose than surveillance to figure out how to turn you into a more lucrative advertising target.

            Apple has realized they can capitalize on this by making privacy a core selling feature for their stuff — one that Google cannot challenge them on as privacy is directly at odds with the core premise of their entire business.

          • Delphia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I use a Samsung because I dont give a fuck about my data personally. Its better because I expect companies that have me as a paying customer to use my data internally, its the onselling to literally anyone with enough money that bothers me.

  • Sir_Kevin@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Like 15 years ago I bought the cheapest Brother laser printer. It’s still going strong. The ink never dries out or fucks up. I’ve never felt like the company was trying to rape my asshole. Why anyone still plays the ink jet game I do not fuckin know. I’ve boycotted HP decades ago and to this day I continue to see reasons to never change that decision.

    • Lemmington Bunnie@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We got a Brother laser as well. Only print a few times a year, and the toner is always good to go when it does get switched on. Love my Brother!

    • d3Xt3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why anyone still plays the ink jet game I do not fuckin know.

      Space. At least for me, space is the reason. I’m flatting at the moment and can only keep the printer in my room, and it’s already quite cramped with all my gear here. If I could get a compact color laser MFD within the same dimensions as my current Brother inkjet, I’d switch in a heartbeart. Most of the compact laser printers I’ve seen are either monochrome, or don’t include form-feed scanning, or have some or the other shortcomings.

      • crashoverride@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Initial cost as well. If you only print very small amount, you’re not going to spend couple hundred bucks on the laser printer and then 100 or so bucks on a cartridge for it if you’re not going to print often

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My Canon ink jet has done well for years on cheap third party ink. It does color and even decent photo, and created many excellent school presentations for my kids. However it’s likely my last printer.

        I don’t even know the last time I printed something, it’s always been for the kids’ schools and now they’re old enough to have no more of those

    • Proweruser@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      5 years ago with a reasonably priced Samsung colour laser scanner combi. No complaints. When I turn it on, it just prints.

    • Irlut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ink and dye printers still rule the photo print space. Laser printers simply don’t have sufficient image quality.

      Other than that I completely agree that laser printing is the way to go.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      the original mastodon post

      Unrelated to this post:

      IMO it’s stuff like this, original content that shows up on Mastodon/Lemmy/Kbin first, that will get people to switch over.

      Slow organic growth is nice. Keep making good quality content and people will shift over

      • jrubal1462@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know what CUPS is, but I had 3 major reservations about switching my barely functional computer to Linux:

        1. Ive never worked in Linux before
        2. My dive computer only uploads to proprietary software using a proprietary cable.
        3. My Brother laser printer was working SO well wirelessly. It’s the first time I’ve ever not hated my printer

        Turns out some amazing people made open source dive logging software so I can still download my dives.

        And for printing, I meant to get around to setting it up, then one day I forgot and accidentally printed something and it just worked. I was so shocked that for a bit I assumed that reformatting the hard drive and changing operating systems must’ve somehow preserved my printer settings.

        • vector_zero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. Start with something simple like Mint or Fedora. It’s quite easy to use.

          2. Can you be more specific about the specific cable and software? Odds are it works, or it can work with some tinkering.

          3. Brother printers work great in Linux in my experience.

          • themarty27@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            While your advice is sound, I think you might not have read @jrubal1462’s comment in full. They already installed Linux, found FOSS alternatives for the proprietary dive software and their printer, to their shock, worked OOTB.

          • jrubal1462@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yup! I had a little difficulty communicating with the computer, but all I had to do was add my user to the “dial-out” group and it worked like a charm.

      • HousePanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I bought the printer when I was living in a place where the nearest library was 10 miles away and I only had access to a bus. I couldn’t afford a car.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kinda baffling that anyone’s still buying HP - isn’t it common knowledge that they’re one of the worst printer brands?

    • Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      HP has decent enterprise models. So office drones will have a positive image of HP. Also old people who have been out of touch with the market for 20 years or so.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The market for people who NEED printers is shrinking. Last concert I went to I had the QR code ticket in my phone, I havent printed map directions in at least 15 years and I literally cannot remember the last item I needed to print at home.

      But they also cant say “Oh well, we had a good 30 year run with home printers” they have to keep making more than last year, so they have to get increasingly predatory.

      • o_oli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just don’t understand why people fall for it. Who is subscribing to this nonsense? I would never purchase or use something like that when there are still other options available. It should have been a dead idea from day 1.

        • phase_change@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because most people aren’t technical enough to understand there are alternatives, particularly if those alternatives involve removing a scary label telling you not to.

      • MuffinHeeler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t had a printer since early 2020 when I was last in the office. Sometimes I definitely miss it. But not enough to buy one.

        Since then, the only thing I’ve needed to print was a visa which said I must carry a printed copy, but at the border it was digitally attached to my passport, so turns out I didn’t need it at all.

    • Heavybell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      We let game publishers and adobe get away with charging infinite money for faux services so now everyone else wants to do the same.

  • ArugulaZ@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    DANGER, WILL ROBINSON! Removing this sticker will reveal a consumer-friendly communications port that will deprive HP of even more money than it’s already milking you for with overpriced ink!

  • Gogo Sempai@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never buying HP printers again, not after I got a Brother one last year. It works OOTB even with linux and there’s no such lockdown bullshit.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        HP small business printers are almost as bad as their home printers.

        Around 2006, I started at a company it had a couple of small business MFPs. I spent more time fixing the printers then they spent printing on them. I ended up talking them into a couple of Enterprise class MFPs They were fantastic but we spent several grand on printers. It’s kind of a shame we don’t print so much, but we scan to email and fax a lot and it was worth it to have something that just works all the time.

        I kind of regret not going with brother at this point though we probably could have gotten away much cheaper.

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been contemplating abandoning my HP (with instant ink subscription) for an Epson Ecotank. Stuff like this isn’t convincing me to stay. My subscription has already risen to $80 a year, so the value is gone.

    • PaulDevonUK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do your self a favour and check out Brother color lasers. Prices are quite good and the speed and quality outstrip a jet by a long way.

      • Veedem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My printer is mainly used for color photos and laser printers just aren’t as good at handling those.

        • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          How many photos do you print to make it worth it? I can send the files to my local photo lab and they generally print them within a couple hours. I’d have to print like 160 4x6 photos to spend the same as you spend each year in ink, and they are quality prints. If I went to Staples it would be even more.

        • symcal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Brother also has those EcoTank-like printers.

          Even if it is not a laser, ink Brother printers are also bulletproof and as everybody says they work like a charm.

          • TheColeys@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I had a brother printer and ditched it for an epson ecotank. Bought new cartridges for the brother and he cleaned it for first use, after that the half of it was empty. I just got about 30 prints from them. He immediatly flew out after this.

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Epson ecoprints might be a good alternative. Bit more expensive upfront, but so much cheaper overall.

    • trachemys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Be sure to research the ink sponge situation on the ecotank. When it is full, epson has drm to force you to get licensed service to replace it. No expensive cartridges, but expensive sponge instead.

    • LifeInOregon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had an EcoTank for two years and have been VERY happy with it. My only complaint is that I should have gone for a model that allows double sided printing.

      The price on the ink is great, that you can fill individual colors as needed is nice, and the print quality is very good.

    • LazaroFilm@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I ditched the cartridge crap for an eco tank and it’s great. You can even buy off brand Ink bottle for super cheap.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People will still buy it when they suffer economically or techonological ignorance. If there was another system where people could vote on a business death penalty… HP and other printer IP holders have already earned my vote.

    • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nothing like having to pull out the official ink to clear a paper jam and be told afterwards that the ink you just took out is not the same official ink or gasp reused so the printer punishes you by using more ink so you buy the official ink next time that you already bought.

      Fuck HP.

  • ArugulaZ@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow, HP. Way to make even Lexmark look like a paragon of corporate virtue in the home printer market.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    A gentle reminder to those coming in to complain about their prior printers: In some areas, libraries have a computer area where you can print out a reasonable number of pages. It’s not totally convenient, but generally a far better option than maintaining your own cartridge-muncher.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t have a printer at home, and I’ve been just fine. Nowadays you don’t even need to print tickets, so who cares about a printer any more. You get them in your email, and all you need to do is show the QR code off your phone when you show up at the event, enter the theater, board the plane or whatever.

  • slidinggoal@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a m11 laser printer. I bought the compatible laser cilinder thingy with a tiger and a green box because hp laser ink is double the price.

    So far I have no problems with printing. Aside from the fact that hp puts an exclamation after each print with the prompt: DANGER! COUNTERFEIT INK CARTRIDGE InstALLED!

    Ok man I’ll be careful so it doesn’t explode. Only because it’s not the proprietary ink…. Hope I didn’t give them any ideas…