SEE SECOND EDIT DOWN BELOW

Lets not beat around the bush here, lots of people like to look at boobs and dicks.

Lemmynsfw was looking like a good place to go, but reading the “Loli” announcement thread where they equate drawn child porn to petite women, its clear the owner is not the right person to be hosting a NSFW instance for the majority of people.

Is there anywhere else that people can recommend?

There is undoubtably a need for such an instance. Can we discuss this like adults?

edit: UPDATE

Take this update as you will

I’m taking it as a backtrack, but it’s still not an instance I want to associate with.

Lots of people keen to offer their opinion of drawn picture of naked kids, haven’t seen any alternatives though

Edit 2: At this point I think their updated rules are good. It took a bit to get there, but in the end they appear to be taking a hard stance. Hopefully this is enforced.

I dont think it was a case of “whoops bad English” like they are suggesting, I think it was a total 180 backflip. This doesnt really instill confidence in the admins IMO, but im happy that they have made the right decision in regards to allowed content. Hopefully this is was just some early wobblies and the community can move on.

  • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    You can block whole communities as user. Personally, I’m not interested in Loli, but their users voted to allow it.

    • nude@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes, that isnt an issue.

      The issue is for those looking for a NSFW instance that dont want to associate with child porn

      • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        You don’t have to join an instance to access their content, though. And if something pops up in your timeline if you select “All”, you can still block the whole community without losing access to others hosted on that server.

        • nude@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes, I am aware of this.

          The point of the thread though is to point out that the instance likely isn’t one that most people looking for a reddit NSFW alternative is one that they want to associate with, and to ask if there are any other alternatives yet

          • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            You don’t associate with an instance by accessing content from it. You do by signing up there and accessing the fediverse as a whole on that account.

            • nude@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              …and if the content there is loli, why would I want to go there?

              And yes, using an instance is associating with it.

              I don’t care if people want to jerk off to drawn pictures of kids.
              I’m pointing out that most people don’t, so its not a suitable instance for the majority of people, and asking if there are any alternatives yet.

              • GunnarRunnar@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 years ago

                You’re absolutely correct. By using said instance you’re helping to build their community (to whatever degree) and by extension supporting the problematic part of the instance.

              • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 years ago

                The moment you have your instance defederate from another one, you decide for all your users, instead of letting them decide for themselves. Why would you want to do that? We have just seen what this does, when beehaw defederated from world and sh.itjust.works. No thanks to that. I, as an adult, can think for myself.

          • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            You won’t find a single big nsfw instance that blocks this stuff, they will all allow it. Just block these communitys and done.

    • BasicWhiteGirl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      They voted? How? How many people are even in that community so far? Seems like the kind of thing to revisit as it grows.

          • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I honestly can’t tell you anything you couldn’t read up in the quoted original post of this thread. I read about it a few minutes ago, so you’re as well-informed about it as me.

            • asjmcguire@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yeah that’s what I meant - I didn’t see a single comment on the announcement post - that agreed with the mod. They are all saying it’s a stupid decision, many are threatening to report any clearly underage content - whether it’s drawn or not.
              The mod might have made the decision, but the users don’t agree with it at all.

              • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 years ago

                I don’t care about all that, or this issue here in general. I’m only replying here, because I personally, as a fediverse user, want to be able to decide myself what I do and don’t want to see. If I have the means to curate the content visible to me, which I do, there’s no need to have someone think and act for me. See where I’m coming from?

      • nude@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I can’t answer because I was banned for saying allowing loli was a bad move, lol

        • Repulsa@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Ah so it isn’t so much that you don’t want to associate with it, it’s more that you got banned so can’t.

          Did you say that you thought it was a ‘bad move’ or did you go all guns blazing and start shouting about child porn?

          • nude@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            No, I was banned after this post was made.

            I dont want to associate with that instance because its making announcements that its decided to allow nude depictions of underage children.

            I said its a dumb move to allow porn that features depictions of children. Being banned doesnt bother me, I only found out when I went to look to see if I could delete my account

      • Aeonx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It does not matter if a community has 2 people or 150 people, whoever is a member of the community at the time their voice matters. And they can revisit that as the community continues to grow.