• megopie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    31 minutes ago

    Ah yes because the cost savings on solar power in constant sunlight over nuclear reactors or solar with batteries definitely justifies the cost of launching hundreds of thousands of tons in to orbit, including the miles of radiators that will be needed to cool all this. Oh and definitely justifies the cost of having to hire astronauts as technicians to repair the thing when something goes wrong.

    The numbers for these data centers don’t even work on fucking earth, how does increasing the set up cost by an order of magnitude make this work?

  • fullsquare@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    “People are planning 10 gigawatt data centers,” Schmidt said. "Gives you a sense of how big this crisis is. Many people think that the energy demand for our industry will go from 3 percent to 99 percent of total generation

    I reasoned that the former Google executive might have bought Relativity Space as a means to support the development of data centers in space.

    absolutely not peak of bubble type bullshit, please give microsoft-sized theranos more money, nothing weird or stupid is happening there

    last time i’ve seen someone wanting to put compute in orbit it was cryptobros trying to avoid everyone’s jurisdiction, presumably to do some financial crimes there. turns out you can get away with this on earth, so it’s unnecessary

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      at least this operation won’t leave behind any e-waste, since it all will burn down when orbit maintaining engines inevitably fail