• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    281
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The internet archive is becoming one of the most valuable sites on the web, specially to avoid paywalled corpo pages.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      And people are abusing the fuck out of it by uploading tons of copyrighted movies. No one seems to be policing it either. I’m very worried that its days are numbered.

      • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The Internet Archive has special status that gives it protections. What might kill it is the erosion of support for public libraries and such. The advancement of media companies’ attempt to have absolute control over everything they release, by binding it into their own services.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah probably. It’s the ordinary playbook of allowing one site to become extreamly popular so it’s much easier to monitor users and shut down if needed.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Imagine how many copyrighted books are in IRL libraries. Now imagine that IRL libraries can copy any book in any amount. Congrats, now you imagined what libraries in Europe can do.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not sure what that has to do with people uploading copyrighted movies to the Internet Archive. You can’t just upload Disney movies to YouTube and expect Disney to not give a shit. They still have legal recourse.

          I hate copyright law, but it still exists. I don’t want the Internet Archive to shut down and I have harvested a lot from the public domain video they archive. But those videos are at risk because people are uploading copyrighted stuff, and eventually a big enough lawsuit is going to take the site down unless they do something about it.

          Also, the video storage end of the site is becoming more and more unusable because of it. It used to be easy to search through videos and find the legitimately public domain ones which you could then use in your own projects. Now if I’m not 100% sure, I have to do a bunch of research… and I know for a fact from talking to some people that they think that if they download video from the Internet Archive, it isn’t copyrighted. And if they then use it in one of their projects, they are at legal risk.

          And if the Internet Archive isn’t going to be the global digital repository for public domain video, then it’s going to be YouTube. Do we really want public domain video to be monetized?

          This is, to me, pretty damn serious.

        • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Uhh what? I’m pretty sure libraries in Europe can’t do that. Do you mean they can photocopy any book they own…?

          • uis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not sure how exactly it worked, but some time ago in Russia it was completely legal for library to copy book, but it seems now laws became more strict. Probably some member of United Russia got a shiny new yacht.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        thats okay, someone will have put all the information on an impossible to search for or browse discord server, that’ll surely last forever. /s

        • shotgun_crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          So when the internet archive archive goes down, we’ll have the internet archive archive archive as a backup? Neat.

      • zerofk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I download the internet archive once every month and copy it to stone tablets. Even if the world’s electricity reserve runs out, we’ll still have those.

        In unrelated news, I’m looking for people with access to big stone quarries.

    • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve lost a lot of my rose tint for discord, right around the arbitration clause thing, but I can’t deny that it’s convenient. Chat, streaming to friends, popping up a new server for whatever project or group, VC for playing games together. There’s platforms that do all of these things better, but few that do all of them decently well.

      Of course, it’s a privacy nightmare and I stick to IRC for anything I wouldn’t feel comfortable having linked to my identity, but I wouldn’t call people stupid for using it.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        11 months ago

        Mostly I think its fine for all that.

        But there’s a special circle of hell for projects that rely on it for “documentation”.

        I get the temptation, I really do. But once you’re taking money or have more than a couple people involved and semi-organized you really need at least a small wiki/git-hub landing page with the basics.

        I know documentation is a separate skillset and a lot of work in its own right but projects can also stagnate and die because there isn’t any.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh 1000% agree, having a discord for support is nice and all, but using it as a crutch in place of good documentation is a sin worthy of eternal damnation.

          • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Heck, even support is a bit of a pain since projects also like to use it as their issue tracker and want you to search for your issue before posting (which it’s awful for). GitHub is free or at least cheap depending on what you need and is way more searchable, as well as giving a place for wiki and a basic website

            Direct chat support, discord is fine, but beyond that, please use something actually designed for it

      • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I haven’t used irc for years but isn’t it all plaintext unencrypted? And isnt your ip tied to it?

        I’ve never looked into any of that for irc so maybe I’m way off base.

        I do remember making my own fvwm config where an irssi irc terminal would slide out of the top of my screen with a hotkey and roll back up again. I was pretty proud of that.

        • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          Closed source software without end to end encryption and has access to all chats, voice and video calls. How can it not be a privacy nightmare. You have no idea what they collect and what they don’t.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Don’t they claim that they can’t access your chat logs unless they get like reports and stuff?

            Edit: This question needs an answer, not a downvote

            • lemmingtree@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              I doubt that. If you do a gdpr request for your data, you’ll see how much they log about your activities. Obviously chats and VC activity, but also all the timestamps of what you play, session data over all time, etc.

        • Chobbes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Or maybe… How is discord any worse of a privacy nightmare than IRC? I love me some IRC, but it ain’t exactly a bastion of secrecy.

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            11 months ago

            IRC clients don’t have loads of telemetry like Discord does. And IRC is a protocol instead of a platform, so there isn’t a single set of servers hosting and logging ALL conversations.

            • Chobbes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              That’s fair, but IRC also tends to leak information about users to everybody. They’re maybe bad in slightly different ways, but frankly if you care about privacy that much you probably shouldn’t use either, at least not with additional protections.

              • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                11 months ago

                IRC doesn’t even see that much info about each user to begin with, especially compared to Discord, and if you’re talking about public IPs - hiding them from other users is now a common thing on servers.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s wild how a good deal of decentralization and FOSS focused communities insist on having Discord be their primary center for community. Worst one is privacy focused communities…

      I can’t say that bridging them to matrix was a foolproof endeavor though

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Amen. Guess it’s the curse of the unknowing youth. They grow up with this bullcrap. I hate discord so much. “oh buy nitro, have stupid stickers!” ugh.

      I really really really miss IRC. What was wrong with it? Why did it die? Did we all die?

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        It is alive and well, never died. Many project still use it for communication, support…

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I know, there’re even gopher, Finger and BBSs still around. But being around isn’t really the same as alive. Except technically.

    • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      IRC is only text chat, Discord does a ton of other things on top.

      Personally I’ve been on the internet for the last… 27 years or so? I’ve used ICQ, Teamspeak, Skype, IRC, Mumble, Discord, Teams, … (Probably forgot a few).

      I never really liked IRC, yes, it’s private servers which is nice, yes you can be relatively anonymous, but the channels were always a mess. Either too many people spamming so you can’t follow a single conversation, or for most channels you had 40 people idling and never responding, so it felt like a ghost town.

      Just in my personal experience Discord works a lot better and is far more convenient. But yeah, not much privacy there obviously (though everything you said in IRC was often saved away by a bot, so either way whatever you said was out there).

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sure, but when everybody’s Discord content vanishes behind a paywall, or makes you watch a 2 minute advert to see a Wiki, what are you going to do?

        Already I can’t just browse the content on a Discord community without “joining” and all that bollocks.

        Like I’m sure Discord is better than IRC, but it’s not better than a collection of open standards so anyone can run a server.

        • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve never seen someone host a wiki on Discord… that’s just stupid.

          Having to join a server before you see its content is a good thing though. It’s a privacy feature and also anti-spam / anti-bots (Before you see anything you often have to agree to the server rules).

          Using Discord for information storage is obviously a bad idea. But for text chat including channels, voice chat and so on it’s fantastic. Most games usually have an extra website with a wiki for information.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            11 months ago

            Having to join a server before you see its content is a good thing though.

            Joining to browse is in no way a good thing. Join to speak, yes. Join to read, no.

            • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              11 months ago

              I think your view of servers here is wrong. They are literally named communities, as in private spaces. You get access if you’re part of that community, otherwise you don’t.

              Discord servers are not public websites or a wiki anyone can access, they are not supposed to be.

              IRC is a tiny bit more open, but even there you need to join a channel to read it and you can get kicked out. For reading the logs a bot saved away you might need an account too (but that’s up to the server admin or whoever is hosting that content).

              • Cake@lemmy.gockandgum.party
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                11 months ago

                Issue with what you are saying is that I have seen a crap ton of software ( Foss software too ) using discord forums / discord I’m general as their “knowledge base” making it quite hard to find solutions for problems or ask questions, where in the past you’d be using a forum for.

                • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Forums in the past always needed an account (with its own registration, accepting rules and so on) before you could ask your question. Hell, a lot of forums barely showed anything besides 2-3 topics and you needed to be logged in to see all areas (sometimes with extra user roles if you wanted to see more).

      • citizen@normalcity.life
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Just in my personal experience Discord works a lot better and is far more convenient

        Your personal experience is biased as fuck because having to go through phone verification or downloading a sketchy proprietary client is in no way far more convenient than firing up irc

      • FishFace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Either too many people spamming so you can’t follow a single conversation, or for most channels you had 40 people idling and never responding, so it felt like a ghost town.

        How is this different to Discord? You have huge, medium and small channels in both.

        • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          Most IRC servers I’ve been to had exactly one channel for the entire community/topic where everyone hung out. Either way, IRC is dead, it’s just fun how triggered some people get about it.

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Far from dead and I have no idea which server you connected to but most servers definitely don’t default to a single channel.

    • wahming@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Except the lack of a decent mobile client that doesn’t require you to self-host something to receive all messages

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is genuinely the only problem why we switched to Signal for work communication. My colleagues wanted us developers to use Slack and other proprietary stuff but IRC was enough. Only issue was that you couldn’t get push notifications on mobile.

    • NostraDavid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Better how? I can’t message people when they’re offline, everything is completely boring text, no images, it’s not clear how I can easily setup my own server, everything feels archaic.

      I tried using it before Discord was even a thing, and I already thought it quite sucked. If you think it’s great, then good on you for knowing everything inside and out, but the discoverability with any IRC client tends to be in the negatives. It feels awful to use.

      • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        everything is completely boring text, no images

        You literally just listed some of the reasons IRC is better. That said, I don’t see any reason an IRC client couldn’t be made to support images, with the understanding that it would have to be done in a way that falls back to posting it as a link for people using text-only clients, but that shouldn’t be too difficult.

        can’t message people when they’re offline,

        This functionality can be enabled on IRC servers or on a per-channel basis using bots.

        it’s not clear how I can easily setup my own server.

        Again an advantage of IRC. Not every group of 2 people need their own server. And a simple 2 second Google search (or learning your IRC client) will show you how to create your own channel in seconds.

        the discoverability with any IRC client tends to be in the negatives.

        That really depends on the client. There are (or at least used to be) plenty of user-friendly IRC clients. How many alternate clients can I use with Discord?

        And heaven forbid someone should have to think for more than 3 seconds when learning something new to them.

        I swear I sometimes think that once all of us Gen-Xers are gone, there won’t be anyone left who actually understands how the Internet or the technology that runs on it actually works, as prophesied by Idiocracy.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      ICQ was nice. It had an IM, a user directory, and alternative clients without games etc, until its owners went crazy.

      Old Skype was nice. It had fast file transfers, a good Linux client, network efficiency etc, until Microsoft.

      I think everybody thought that just like from proprietary ICQ everybody went to proprietary Skype and it was nice, there’s going to be an equally good alternative when Skype rots and people will move to it.

      There are fscking none among the popular IMs.

        • Russ@bitforged.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Also, IRC doesn’t constantly try to throw “upgrades” (Nitro) in your face every single moment that it gets.

        • ABCDE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I have used both, aside from the monetisation (Nitro), Discord (and Slack) has a lot more functionality. Not sure it’s ‘correct’ to say that people are stupid because they prefer a 21st century version of IRC.

          • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Matrix stack would be the 21st century equivalent. Discord is just another Skype - entirely a proprietary product that you don’t operate yourself. Fine for corporate use where people don’t care about longevity because it’s not their problem or interest, but trash for everything else.

            • ABCDE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              I just searched for “Matrix stack” but I’m none-the-wiser, what is it?

              Right, you don’t run the thing yourself at a program level, but you can create and moderate channels as you wish, which is what most people want. Sounds like the Windows v Linux argument, just because a lot of people prefer something doesn’t mean we have to shit on it. Discord seems to work well with lots of integration (including on consoles) and fulfils its purpose pretty well from what I can tell.

              trash for everything else

              How?

              • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                It’s an entirely closed source, proprietary codebase, run by a for-profit company where you have little control over anything. These corporations don’t care about actual users and they will leave you high and dry. There is a reason people still use IRC - it’s open, easy to connect to and has been around for literal decades. Remember CompuServe? AOL? AIM? ICQ? Google Chat shutting it’s doors to xmpp? If so, you understand the pattern. It’s about walled gardens and blocking interoperability. The industry doesn’t need more of that. We are chatting on an open source link aggregation site because bean counters at Reddit decided to shut off APIs to existing apps arbitrarily.

                The matrix stack solves most of those problems by providing an open source codebase and protocol, easy to connect to solution that is akin to Slack. I am fortunate enough to not have to use discord much beyond checking on a class schedule and downloading some sheet music, so I will never be a discord power user. Maybe some there is crazy awesome feature that discord provides that no open source platform does, but I have some serious doubts about that.

                • uis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Maybe some there is crazy awesome feature that discord provides that no open source platform does

                  It would go into discord feature parity megaissue on github

                • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Maybe some there is crazy awesome feature that discord provides that no open source platform does

                  I don’t think any open source platform brings together the kind of functionality Discord currently has, but I’m open to being corrected on that. If there was a better platform doing what Discord does then that would be great to use. Having had to switch from different platforms for video calling for various reasons I get what you mean.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Any guides on how to get started on IRC? I gave it a try a couple months ago but couldn’t find any good communities.

    • Floshie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      It was better before, now non tech savy people prefer something I don’t like, therefore they are stupid.

      • nixcamic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        No it’s not cause it’s easy to use, it’s cause Discord is controlled by a single company with various features behind paywalls and only one functional client app.

        • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          None of the paid features are necessary for effectively using it, they’re just “fun add-ons”

          No API for third party apps is a genuine complaint though, it would be nice if there was at least some competitive push for them to have to strive to meet pushing them to be better

  • reflex@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Someone archived all the quotes on the Internet Archive.

    Phew. Otherwise we’d need to share all the quotes by mouth around a hobo campfire.
    I’ve read Fahrenheit 451 so i noe.

    • Geobloke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      We used to read it as kids when we went over our internet quota for the week and it was the only thing that still loaded

      • Drusas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        How old were you then? What was your internet quota? It’s so interesting to hear how different age groups or demographics interacted with the same content.

        • bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          For me in the mid 2000s we had satellite internet and I think the daily quota was like 200mb.

          • hinterlufer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I remember around the same time we had a 300 MB monthly quota on dialup. It made me very wary of what I did online and how large different kinda of media is.

            Things changed a bit after we got a 4(?)GB monthly quota over 3G a few years later.

        • Geobloke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          A teenager, so early to mid 2000s. I can’t remember what the quota was other than a couple of dodgy limewire albums and computer aids. And dad getting pissed when we pretty much bricked his computer

    • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I read it a lot, but it feels like there hasn’t been new content in years, so I stopped visiting at some point.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    11 months ago

    I guess he’ll never put on his robe and wizard hat nor cast level 3 eroticism ever again.

    not gonna lie, I am like…genuinely kinda misty eyed over the end of the era.

  • Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 months ago

    Damn, I hope it comes back. Bash was one of the greatest monuments to internet history.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m glad it got archived, but if you think those weren’t fake I have a bridge in New York for sale cheap.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, seconded. I saw a decent chunk of things in person like I saw on bash.org. People were silly and/or dumb long before friendster, myspace, facebook, etc. and did plenty of shitposting (and just general cringe-y teenage obnoxiousness) on IRC and the like.

        • skulblaka@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 months ago

          Shitposting is a tradition literally as old as the internet

          It’s older than that, really, but before message boards it was just pranking, so honestly I’m glad for people to have the emotional outlet this way instead

          • psud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s nice here that so many have their proper name. I couldn’t get “psud” on Reddit, I have it on three instances here :)

            If there are people here who have known me on any of the old internet they might recognise me

      • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s an actual submission from there written by me (and posted by someone else). I am (very) mildly internet famous, under another handle.

        Can confirm that at least one of them is genuine.

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I have massive logs from IRC in the 20teens. I used IRC loads when the web was new, and revisited it and built a couple of bots in 2015ish, and one of those logged everything as part of a game - it was a spy

        IRC is chat. Chat is sometimes nuts

    • verysoft@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Who cares if something is ‘fake’ if you get enjoyment from it? It’s the same as any scripted comedy.